@MBjegovic avatar

@MBjegovic

@MBjegovic

Independent economic analyst and Twitter commentator; no formal affiliation mentioned

Domain Expertise:
U.S. Economic Data AnalysisLabor Market TrendsFinancial Market CommentaryCPI and Inflation Critique
Detected Biases:
Skepticism toward official U.S. government economic statisticsBearish outlook on financial markets and AI hypeCritical stance on politicians across parties
82%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Marko Bjegovic, known on Twitter as @MBjegovic, is an independent economic analyst and commentator active on the platform since at least 2023, based on available posts. He frequently analyzes U.S. economic data, including employment reports, CPI figures, and market trends, often critiquing official statistics for inaccuracies. Recent activities as of November 2025 include threads on the November employment report, discussions on stock market bubbles (e.g., AI CAPEX and NVDA), and commentary on political figures and economic policies. He positions himself as a data-driven skeptic of mainstream economic narratives, with posts gaining traction among finance enthusiasts.

How Credible Are They?

82%
Baseline Score

Bjegovic appears credible as a self-taught economic commentator with a track record of data-informed posts, though his unverified status and lack of professional affiliations limit institutional trust. His content is analytical and consistent, appealing to audiences questioning mainstream narratives, but it leans interpretive rather than purely factual. No evidence of misinformation or controversies enhances his reliability in niche finance discussions, scoring moderately high for transparency in economic skepticism.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Bjegovic's posts demonstrate a consistent focus on economic data interpretation, often highlighting discrepancies in official reports (e.g., labor market and CPI inaccuracies). No major fact-checks, corrections, or controversies found in searches; his analyses align with critical economic perspectives but lack peer-reviewed backing. Historical posts from 2023-2025 show reliable sourcing from public data, though interpretive claims (e.g., on market bubbles) are opinion-based without documented errors.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author