About TruthSignal

Making it simple to know what's most likely true, and what's not

The Problem We're Solving

We live in an era of hypergeneration where social media algorithms reward clicks over credibility, and the race for attention corrupts the very foundation of trustworthy information.

Generative AI has made this crisis exponentially worse. Anyone can now manufacture convincing content at scale, making it harder than ever to separate fact from fiction, authentic voices from synthetic noise.

The question isn't just "What's true?", it's "Who can I trust?" and "What should I believe?" These are increasingly difficult questions in a world drowning in information.

Truth Isn't Binary

Most media presents the world in absolutes: true or false, right or wrong, credible or not credible. But in reality, complex claims exists in shades of gray and nuance.

Everything is probabilities. The truth is rarely 100% certain. A claim might be 70% likely to be accurate based on available evidence. A source might be credible on some topics but biased on others. Context matters. Nuance matters.

Traditional media's binary framing forces us to pick sides before we've even understood the full picture. We think that's backwards.

How We Work

We leverage large language models (LLMs) that have read vast amounts of the internet to give us a primitive initial view. But we don't stop there.

We then research, verify, and update using real-time data, checking sources, cross-referencing claims, and applying Bayesian mathematics to calculate the probability of accuracy.

Bayesian reasoning lets us start with prior knowledge, incorporate new evidence systematically, and compute posterior probabilities, giving you a nuanced, evidence-based assessment rather than a binary judgment.

The result? You see credibility scores like 73% accurate instead of just "true" or "false", because that's what the evidence actually supports.

Beyond Facts: Understanding Intent

Here's the thing most fact-checkers miss: people don't just lie outright. They selectively share or omit facts to manipulate how you perceive reality. This is called framing.

A politician might cite a true statistic but leave out critical context that completely changes its meaning. A news article might emphasize one fact while burying another that tells a different story.

We analyze what's being said and what's being left unsaid. We flag logical fallacies, psychological manipulation, and framing violations. We help you understand not just what's factually accurate, but what the speaker's intent might be.

Because knowing why someone is saying something is just as important as knowing what they're saying.

Our Mission

We're on a mission to make it simple for people to know what is most likely true and what is not—leveraging LLMs and Bayesian mathematics to cut through the noise.

In a world of infinite content and finite attention, you deserve tools that help you navigate information intelligently. Not tools that tell you what to think, but tools that show you how to think about what you're reading.

We believe informed citizens make better decisions. We believe nuance beats oversimplification. We believe probabilities beat absolutes.

And we believe you deserve to know the truth, or at least, what's most likely to be true.

Ready to see how it works?

Explore Latest Analyses