@Lebona_cabonena avatar

@Lebona_cabonena

@Lebona_cabonena

No formal job title or affiliation identified; appears to be an independent social commentator and Twitter influencer focused on South African societal issues.

Domain Expertise:
Social justice and anti-racismSouth African politics and cultureOnline community building
Detected Biases:
Strong anti-racism and pro-Black empowerment stanceCriticism of white privilege and celebrity culture in South Africa
65%
Average Truthfulness
2
Posts Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Sir Cabonena Alfred, known on Twitter as @Lebona_cabonena, is a South African social media user active since November 2013. He frequently posts about social issues, including racism, white supremacy, gender-based violence in South Africa, and critiques of celebrity culture and politics. Recent activities as of September 2025 include discussions on Twitter monetization, debates with other users, and calls for verified accounts to connect. He has celebrated milestones like reaching 50,000 followers and often engages with his audience by questioning the authenticity of followers and sharing personal reflections.

How Credible Are They?

65%
Baseline Score

As an unverified Twitter user with a decade-long presence, @Lebona_cabonena demonstrates consistency in voicing social concerns relevant to South African audiences, fostering community engagement around 50k followers. However, his content is predominantly subjective and opinion-driven, with occasional defensive responses to accusations of inaccuracy, limiting credibility as a factual source. No professional affiliations or cross-platform verification enhance reliability; suitable for sentiment on grassroots issues but not for authoritative reporting.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Limited formal fact-checks or corrections available; posts are largely opinion-based on social topics with no major verified controversies. Some user interactions accuse him of exaggeration or unproven claims (e.g., regarding account creation and monetization), but he defends his posts as consistent since 2013. Historical tweets show patterns of provocative commentary without evident retractions, suggesting reliability in personal narrative but potential for unsubstantiated opinions.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author