@visegrad24 avatar

@visegrad24

@visegrad24

X Verified

Independent social media news aggregator and content creator, managed by Stefan Tompson and a small team; no formal affiliation with government or media outlets, though suspected informal links to Polish conservative circles

Domain Expertise:
Geopolitics in Central and Eastern EuropeInternational conflicts (Ukraine-Russia, Israel-Hamas)Conservative political commentary
Detected Biases:
Strong right-wing conservative bias favoring figures like Viktor Orbán and Donald TrumpPro-Israel and pro-Ukraine stance with anti-Muslim and anti-migration narrativesSuspected ties to Polish government promoting illiberal CEE viewpoints
35%
Average Truthfulness
9
Posts Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Visegrád 24 is a social media account on X (formerly Twitter) founded in January 2020 by an anonymous group of conservative individuals, primarily focused on current events in Central and Eastern Europe, the Visegrád Group, and global conflicts such as the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war. It is operated by a small team, with South African-Polish content creator Stefan Tompson identified as a key founder and manager. The account has grown rapidly, amassing over 1.1 million followers by 2024, and is known for high-volume posting (up to 80 posts per day) with billions of impressions during major events. Recent activities include extensive coverage of the Israel-Hamas conflict from a pro-Israel perspective, investigative reporting via its @V24Investigates subunit, and original video content. It has faced scrutiny for alleged ties to the Polish government and promotion of illiberal narratives.

How Credible Are They?

35%
Baseline Score

Visegrád 24 exhibits low overall credibility due to its history of disseminating unverified and misleading content, extreme ideological bias, and lack of transparency about its operators and funding. While it has built significant influence through rapid, high-engagement posting and original investigations, its track record of controversies—including fact-check failures and accusations of state-sponsored disinformation—undermines its reliability as a news source. It functions more as an opinion aggregator than a journalistic outlet, suitable for gauging conservative sentiments but not for factual reporting without independent verification.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

The account has a mixed to poor record on accuracy, frequently sharing unverified information, misleading claims, and disinformation, particularly on sensitive topics like the Ukraine war and Gaza conflict. Fact-checks from outlets like OKO.press, Media Bias/Fact Check, and Ground News highlight repeated instances of fake news, lack of sourcing, and corrections needed; while it occasionally links to sources in replies, it has been labeled a 'questionable source' for promoting propaganda without accountability

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author