@UltraDane avatar

@UltraDane

@UltraDane

Independent social media commentator or content curator; no formal professional affiliation disclosed in bio or tweets

Domain Expertise:
Social media analysisCultural commentaryViral content sharing
Detected Biases:
Strong nationalist and racial framing in commentaryCriticism of mainstream media and progressive social movementsSensationalist amplification of viral, unverified stories
45%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

The Twitter account @UltraDane, operated by an individual named Dane, has been active since at least late 2022, posting content focused on social media influencers, racial and cultural issues, and provocative commentary on current events. Recent activities as of October 2025 include sharing videos and opinions on topics like influencer deaths, transphobia accusations, and European social dynamics, with posts garnering significant views (up to millions) but varying engagement. The account appears to thrive on sensationalism, often highlighting viral content from other platforms while critiquing mainstream media and social trends.

How Credible Are They?

45%
Baseline Score

Low to moderate credibility overall; @UltraDane functions as a curator of edgy, opinion-driven content rather than a reliable source. The account's unverified status, lack of professional affiliations, and tendency to post inflammatory material without evidence raise concerns about bias and accuracy. While it achieves high engagement in echo chambers, it lacks transparency and journalistic standards, making it unsuitable for factual reliance. Cross-platform consistency exists in style but not in depth, with no evident corrections or accountability for past claims.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Limited verifiable historical accuracy; posts often amplify unconfirmed or sensational claims about influencer incidents and social issues without sourcing, leading to potential misinformation. No major fact-checks or corrections identified, but content patterns suggest a history of provocative, unsubstantiated narratives that align with ideological views rather than factual reporting.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author