@TomANelson

Who Is This Person?

Tom Nelson is a climate change skeptic and podcaster who hosts the 'Tom Nelson Podcast,' focusing on interviews with scientists, experts, and commentators challenging the mainstream narrative on anthropogenic global warming (AGW). He describes his journey from a casual believer in AGW to a skeptic after personal research into the evidence. Active on Twitter since at least 2019, he shares skeptical content, promotes resources like peer-reviewed papers questioning climate alarmism, and critiques fact-checkers, media, and organizations. Recent activities as of October 2025 include podcast episodes on topics like junk science, scaremongering in climate discourse, and responses to government reports, alongside promoting satirical pieces and engaging in debates on platform censorship of skeptical views.

Tom Nelson is a dedicated advocate for climate skepticism, credible within contrarian circles for curating alternative scientific perspectives and conducting unfiltered interviews that highlight dissenting voices. His background as a self-taught researcher adds authenticity to his claims of evidence-based conversion, supported by references to peer-reviewed literature. However, his outright rejection of AGW consensus, involvement in censored content, and polarized rhetoric (e.g., labeling climate science a 'massive fraud') undermine broader credibility, as they align with disputed narratives often fact-checked as misleading by mainstream outlets. Overall, he exerts niche influence but is viewed as biased and low-credibility by consensus science proponents, making him a polarizing figure suitable for skeptical discourse rather than neutral analysis.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Nelson's content emphasizes skeptical scientific papers (e.g., citing 1,500+ peer-reviewed works from 2016-2018 and 200+ from 2019) and personal fact-checking, positioning him as a promoter of alternative climate views. However, his material, such as 'Climate: The Movie,' has been flagged and censored by platforms like Facebook and Instagram following fact-checks deeming it false. He has faced blocks from opponents in debates and accuses mainstream sources of misinformation, with no documented retractions from his side but ongoing controversies over rejecting climate consensus. Historical posts show consistent evolution from mild skepticism to strong advocacy, with engagement building over time.