@SwipeWright avatar

@SwipeWright

@SwipeWright

Fellow at the Manhattan Institute; Evolutionary Biologist and Independent Science Writer

Domain Expertise:
Evolutionary BiologySex and Gender ScienceAcademic Integrity and Peer Review
Detected Biases:
Critique of 'Social Justice' ideology and progressive academiaAdvocacy for biological realism in sex/gender debates
85%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Colin Wright, known on Twitter as @SwipeWright, is an evolutionary biologist and science writer who gained prominence for his critiques of gender ideology, the sex spectrum hypothesis, and social justice influences in academia. He co-founded the newsletter Reality's Last Stand in 2020 to discuss these topics. Wright has been active on Twitter since at least 2020, posting frequently on scientific integrity, peer review flaws, and transgender-related issues. Recent activities (as of November 2025) include analyzing a new paper promoting 'data activism' over empirical accuracy in trans research and discussing social contagion in trans identities, with posts garnering tens of thousands of views. He has faced cancellations and controversies for his views but continues to publish in outlets like the Wall Street Journal and academic journals.

How Credible Are They?

85%
Baseline Score

High credibility as a biologist with a track record of evidence-based arguments against ideological overreach in science. His Twitter engagement is strong, with consistent, high-impact posts (average 10,000+ views, 300+ likes per tweet based on samples). No evidence of misinformation; controversies stem from challenging mainstream narratives on trans issues rather than factual errors. Cross-platform consistency reinforces reliability, though his anti-woke stance may introduce perceived bias in social policy discussions.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Wright's claims are generally supported by scientific evidence in biology and evolutionary fields, with accurate debunkings of pseudoscience (e.g., sex spectrum myths). No major fact-checks or corrections found; however, his work has sparked controversies, including calls for retraction of papers he critiques and personal cancellations in 2020 for opposing gender ideology. Engages in rhetorical debates but prioritizes data over activism, as seen in his analyses of peer-reviewed studies.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author