@stillgray
Independent commentator and content creator
Ian Miles Cheong, known online as @stillgray, is a Malaysian-born writer and commentator who gained prominence through gaming journalism before transitioning to broader social and political commentary on Twitter/X. He built his online presence starting in the early 2010s, initially focusing on Reddit and gaming communities, and has since become a vocal critic of mainstream media, cultural issues, and social media algorithms. As of 2025, he remains highly active on X, posting daily about current events, Twitter's platform changes, and conservative-leaning topics. Recent activities include critiquing X's 'For You' page algorithm for reducing visibility of non-leftist content, discussing impression drops for creators, and engaging with Elon Musk on verification and audience authenticity issues.
@stillgray (Ian Miles Cheong) is a influential figure in right-leaning online discourse, valued for his timely insights into social media mechanics and cultural debates. His background in gaming journalism lends authenticity to tech-related commentary, and his self-built audience demonstrates organic growth without major bot issues. However, his pronounced bias toward conservative viewpoints can lead to selective reporting, potentially skewing facts to fit narratives. Overall, he is credible for opinion and analysis but less so for neutral fact-reporting; cross-verification with diverse sources is recommended, especially on controversial topics. No significant controversies have derailed his platform presence, and his engagement with verified users like Elon Musk bolsters his visibility.
Assessment by Grok AI
Cheong has a mixed track record of accuracy; he frequently shares sourced news stories and highlights underreported events, earning credibility among followers for spotting trends early. However, some posts have amplified unverified claims or conspiracy-adjacent narratives, particularly on topics like media bias and cultural wars, leading to occasional fact-checks by outlets like Snopes for exaggeration rather than outright falsehoods. No major retractions or bans noted, but his opinion-heavy style requires fact-checking by audiences.
Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author