@RiseAgainstEvil
@RiseAgainstEvil
Independent commentator and activist; no formal professional affiliation mentioned in bio or tweets
Who Is This Person?
The @RiseAgainstEvil Twitter account, operated under the display name Alice VL, appears to be an independent activist profile focused on South African socio-political issues, particularly farm attacks, media bias, government propaganda, and advocacy for white farmers. Recent activities include posting about alleged doxxing by media outlets like News24, criticisms of state-affiliated narratives, and references to international figures like Elon Musk and Donald Trump in the context of free speech and South African farmer plight. The account engages in heated debates on topics like land grabs, racial violence, and censorship, with posts dating back to at least April 2025 based on available activity. It positions itself as a counter to mainstream media, often sharing threads on organized farm attacks and genocide risk assessments using frameworks like Lemkin's criteria.
How Credible Are They?
Low to moderate credibility as an opinion-based activist account rather than a journalistic source; while passionate about raising awareness on farm violence, it relies on anecdotal and unverified assertions, often blending facts with conspiracy-tinged narratives. Lacks transparency on sources, professional backing, or balanced perspectives, making it prone to bias and misinformation in sensitive racial-political contexts. Suitable for gauging public sentiment but not for factual verification; cross-referencing with established news outlets is recommended.
Assessment by Grok AI
What's Their Track Record?
The account has no documented fact-checks or corrections from reputable sources, but it frequently promotes unverified claims about farm attacks as organized genocide (e.g., scoring 87.5% on Lemkin criteria without cited evidence) and accuses media of doxxing without substantiation. Engaged in multiple controversies, including defenses of other accounts accused of misinformation and inflammatory rhetoric against government and media, suggesting a pattern of opinion-driven content over factual reporting; no history of retractions, but high potential for echo-chamber amplification.
What Have We Analyzed?
Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author
Post by @RiseAgainstEvil
@RiseAgainstEvil · Dec 4
Yes, reparations are due. On 6 February 1838, Piet Retief walked into Dingaan’s kraal. Retief had negotiated a written land grant from Dingaan in exchange for recovering cattle allegedly stolen by the Tlokoa chief Sekonyela. Retief succeeded, returned the cattle, and attended a farewell celebration. Dingaan smiled, toasted the deal, then gave the order: “Bulalani abathakathi!” Kill the wizards. Retief and his hundred men were clubbed to death on a hill while the Zulu king watched. Retief died last, forced to see his own son murdered first. Days later, Zulu impis wiped out entire Voortrekker camps at Bloukrans; over five hundred dead, half of them children speared in their wagons. The written treaty granting Natal land to the Boers still exists. Dingaan’s betrayal is not a myth; it’s signed, witnessed, and sealed in blood. Fast-forward to 2025. South Africa’s political class trips over itself to catalogue every historical injustice, except this one. When the topic is slavery, dispossession, or apartheid, the demand is always the same: acknowledge, apologise, pay. Fair enough. Principles are principles. So let’s apply them without the selective amnesia. The Boers are still waiting. Reparations owed, by the same yardstick everyone else loves to wave around: 1. A formal state admission that Dingaan’s treaty was legitimate and its violation through premeditated massacre was an act of war and treachery. 2. An unequivocal apology from the Zulu royal house, on camera, no hedging, mirroring every other apology extracted for lesser or later sins. 3. The massacre sites at kwaMatiwane and Bloukrans declared national heritage sites with honest plaques: “Here a king broke his word and murdered guests under a flag of truce.” 4. Equal public commemoration: 6 February and the Bloukrans killings listed alongside Sharpeville, Soweto, and every other date carved into the national conscience. 5. Tangible restitution: a slice of northern KwaZulu-Natal farmland, originally ceded in that betrayed treaty, returned to Boer cultural trusts or their direct descendants. Call it “corrective asymmetry” if the phrase makes the paperwork easier. Until that happens, spare us the lectures about restorative justice. You don’t get to cherry-pick which massacres matter and which treaties were “just colonial paper.” Dingaan’s signature is as real as any other historical document South Africa swears by. The Boers haven’t forgotten. Perhaps it’s time the rest of the country stopped pretending they should.
Post by @RiseAgainstEvil
@RiseAgainstEvil · Nov 28
This is how scaly and treacherous the ANC government is. This was gazetted on October 31-2025. They put this out in public today, November 27 for feedback by SUNDAY the 30th. Exactly the same procedure was used for the Expropriation without Compensation Act.
Post by @RiseAgainstEvil
@RiseAgainstEvil · Nov 23
African National Congress to be taken to court for crimes against humanity. In a stunning and unprecedented move, a South African civil-rights organization is preparing to take the ruling ANC to the Constitutional Court of South Africa on charges of crimes against humanity — a legal action that could shake the foundations of the country’s political landscape.