@phakxx avatar

@phakxx

@phakxx

Columnist at Independent Online (IOL), freelance journalist and political commentator

Domain Expertise:
South African politicsJournalism and media ethicsSocial justice and working-class issues
Detected Biases:
Strong pro-EFF and left-leaning political advocacyCriticism of mainstream media and opposition parties like the DA
82%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Phakamile Hlubi-Majola, known on X (formerly Twitter) as @phakxx, is a South African journalist, commentator, and columnist actively engaged in political and media discourse. Her posts focus on South African politics, journalism ethics, and social issues, often supporting progressive or left-leaning views, including affiliations with figures and outlets linked to the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF). She has been active since at least 2023, with recent activities in 2025 including critiques of political misinformation, defenses of journalists, and announcements of her writing contributions. No specific account creation date is publicly detailed in available sources, but her posting history indicates long-term presence on the platform.

How Credible Are They?

82%
Baseline Score

Phakamile Hlubi-Majola demonstrates credible expertise as a journalist through her IOL column and informed commentary on South African affairs. Her unverified X account shows authentic engagement without signs of bot-like activity or inauthenticity. While her bias toward progressive politics is evident, it does not undermine factual reporting in identified content. Overall, she is a reliable voice in niche political discussions, though users should cross-verify opinion pieces for balance.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or major controversies directly involving misinformation from @phakxx. Her posts emphasize calling out hypocrisy in media and politics, with a focus on evidence-based critiques (e.g., demanding proof for claims). Historical accuracy appears solid based on available public interactions, though her opinionated style occasionally leads to heated debates without formal retractions.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author