@Notwokenow avatar

@Notwokenow

@Notwokenow

Independent social media commentator; no formal job title or institutional affiliation mentioned in bio or posts

Domain Expertise:
Conservative politicsSocial media dynamicsOnline community building
Detected Biases:
Strong conservative and anti-leftist rhetoricFrequent dismissal of opposing views as 'commie trolls'
75%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

The Twitter account @Notwokenow, with display name 'Kentucky Girl', appears to be a personal account run by an individual identifying as from Kentucky. Active since at least 2024 based on available posts, the account focuses on conservative political commentary, social interactions, and critiques of online trolls and foreign influences on U.S. discourse. Recent activities as of October 2025 include discussions on follower growth (from 45,000 in September to nearing 60,000), complaints about algorithmic visibility, and warnings about accounts that bait users into reports. No specific account creation date is confirmed in public records, but posts indicate steady activity over the past year with rapid follower increase. The account emphasizes authentic engagement and avoids elitist settings like reply restrictions to verified users only.

How Credible Are They?

75%
Baseline Score

As a personal Twitter account, @Notwokenow demonstrates moderate credibility in informal conservative commentary, bolstered by growing follower engagement and transparent interaction style. However, the absence of verification, professional affiliations, and cross-platform consistency limits it to influencer-level reliability rather than authoritative sourcing. No red flags for deliberate misinformation, but bias toward partisan narratives warrants caution for factual reporting; suitable for sentiment analysis in political discussions but not as a primary news source.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or major controversies identified in searches or posts. Content is predominantly opinion-based, focusing on personal views, follower advice, and political rants without verifiable claims. Historical posts show consistent conservative leanings without evident misinformation spreads, but lack of journalistic sourcing suggests reliance on anecdotal evidence rather than rigorous fact-checking.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author