@Nicole_Barlow1 avatar

@Nicole_Barlow1

@Nicole_Barlow1

Self-proclaimed environmental activist and social commentator; no formal professional title or affiliation explicitly stated in bio or recent tweets

Domain Expertise:
South African politicsEnvironmental activismSocial justice commentary
Detected Biases:
Strong anti-ANC and anti-government sentimentOpinionated activism favoring environmental and social reform narratives
55%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Nicole Barlow, known on Twitter as @Nicole_Barlow1, is a South African social media user and self-proclaimed 'green warrior' who gained attention in 2023 for a controversial tweet referencing Chris Hani and wishing harm on politician Gwede Mantashe, which she defended by comparing it to the chant 'Kill the Boer.' She remains active on Twitter as of 2025, frequently posting about South African political and social issues, including criticism of the ANC government, corruption, crime syndicates, and societal barbarism. Recent activities include commentary on government failures, taxi industry violence, and international political figures, with posts showing ongoing engagement in local activism and opinion-sharing.

How Credible Are They?

55%
Baseline Score

Nicole Barlow appears to be an independent online commentator rather than a professional journalist or expert, with credibility limited to personal perspectives on South African issues. Her unverified status and history of controversial statements suggest low reliability for factual reporting, though she maintains consistency in her activist voice across tweets. Engagement indicates a niche audience, but potential for biased or inflammatory content reduces overall trustworthiness; recommended to cross-verify any claims made.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Primarily shares opinion-based content with strong political slant; involved in a 2023 controversy over an inflammatory tweet that sparked public backlash and media coverage, but no formal fact-checks, retractions, or corrections documented; tweets often express personal outrage without sourcing, leading to potential for unverified claims; no history of professional journalism or fact-based reporting

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author

Post by @Nicole_Barlow1

@Nicole_Barlow1

@Nicole_Barlow1 · Oct 22

40%
Uncertain

To fully grasp the betrayal of South Africa, one must be willing to confront some uncomfortable truths and harsh realities. The ANC played no decisive role in bringing an end to apartheid. In fact, the ANC was among the most inept of all supposed liberation movements. A Russian report, after a contingent of uMkhonto we Sizwe (MK) soldiers received training in the Soviet Union, remarked, "It would be an achievement if most of them could shoot themselves in the foot." The National Intelligence Service (NIS) had thoroughly infiltrated the ANC and was monitoring all of their communications. Both the Americans and the British were committed to facilitating a peaceful transition of power to the ANC. This set the stage for negotiations, which were largely orchestrated by the Afrikaner Broederbond and Western powers. The CIA and America has a long and complex history in South Africa, from betraying P.W. Botha over the wars in Angola and South West Africa - leading to his Total Onslaught policy - to ultimately turning Mandela into a global symbol and martyr. In 1985, P.W. Botha delivered the famous "Crossing the Rubicon" speech, which was expected to herald major reforms. However, no such reforms materialised, as Botha realised the West was interfering directly in South Africa’s internal affairs. By the time the Berlin Wall fell and Communism in Russia collapsed, South Africa's border wars had drained the nation's finances. South African intelligence agents, stationed in Germany, waited to see if Russia would attempt to assert military control after the collapse of the Soviet Union. When it became clear that Russia would not intervene, it essentially gave the South African government the green light to negotiate, knowing that the ANC wouldn't have Soviet backing if they declared war. The United States instructed De Klerk to remove Botha from power, which he did after Botha either suffered a stroke or was poisoned - there are differing opinions on the cause. Yes, apartheid had reached an inevitable end for a variety of reasons. However, De Klerk was weak and naïve in his handling of the process. After the CODESA talks, the negotiations were largely hijacked by Roelf Meyer and Cyril Ramaphosa (Roelf Meyer eventually joined the ANC), to the point where De Klerk realised that major concessions were being made without even consulting him. The general public really had no idea what was going on.

15 Facts
5 Opinions
Read analysis →