@NicHulscher avatar

@NicHulscher

@NicHulscher

Epidemiologist & Administrator, McCullough Foundation

Domain Expertise:
EpidemiologyPublic HealthVaccine Safety Research
Detected Biases:
Strong anti-mRNA vaccine advocacyPromotion of alternative health narratives over mainstream consensusAssociation with vaccine-skeptic organizations
35%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, is an epidemiologist with a Bachelor of Science from Oakland University’s Honors College (2020) and a Master of Public Health in Epidemiology from the University of Michigan (2024). He serves as a Fellow and Administrator at the McCullough Foundation, focusing on public health research, particularly vaccine safety, mRNA technology impacts, and related health issues. Hulscher is highly active on X (formerly Twitter) under @NicHulscher, where he frequently posts about alleged vaccine harms, including links between mRNA shots and heart damage, cancer, autism, and fertility issues. Recent activities (as of October 2025) include sharing peer-reviewed studies on COVID-19 vaccine-induced cardiac arrest, DNA contamination in vaccines, and critiques of public health policies. He has been involved in symposia like the Reclaiming Health & Longevity Symposium and contributes to platforms like Substack, emphasizing epidemiological analysis of vaccine-related adverse events.

How Credible Are They?

35%
Baseline Score

Hulscher presents as a credentialed epidemiologist but his credibility is undermined by affiliations with vaccine-critical groups like the McCullough Foundation and a track record of promoting contentious claims that have been fact-checked as inaccurate or exaggerated. While his educational background lends some legitimacy to public health discussions, his output consistently aligns with anti-vaccine sentiments, often prioritizing anecdotal or preliminary studies over established scientific consensus. This raises concerns about objectivity, particularly in sensitive areas like vaccine safety. Engagement on X reflects influence within echo chambers but limited broader acceptance; cross-platform consistency reinforces his niche role, though it highlights potential for spreading unverified information.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Hulscher's work has faced significant scrutiny, including a 2025 Al Jazeera fact-check labeling his claims on mRNA vaccines and cancer links as defamatory and misleading. He promotes studies and reports on vaccine harms that are often from alternative or peer-reviewed but controversial sources, with limited mainstream validation. No formal corrections issued by Hulscher, but his assertions on topics like vaccine-induced autism, heart micro-scarring, and DNA contamination have been disputed by fact-checkers and health authorities for lacking robust causal evidence or relying on selective data. Historical posts show a pattern of amplifying unverified or emerging research without caveats, contributing to misinformation concerns in public health discourse.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author

Post by @NicHulscher

@NicHulscher

@NicHulscher · Oct 28

21%
Not Credible

BREAKING — The Most Comprehensive Analysis Ever Conducted on the Causes of Autism Finds Vaccination Is the DOMINANT Risk Factor After decades of censorship and denial, the McCullough Foundation’s Landmark Report of over 300 studies finally delivers the verdict: Autism’s rise is multifactorial—but vaccination is the MOST significant, preventable driver. We found potential determinants of new-onset autism before age 9 to include: Older parents (>35 years mother, >40 years father) Premature delivery (<37 weeks) Common genetic variants Siblings with autism Maternal immune activation In utero drug exposure Environmental toxicants Gut–brain axis alterations And combination routine childhood vaccination Of 136 studies evaluating vaccines or their components: 107 (79%) found evidence consistent with a vaccine–autism link 29 claimed “no association,” yet lacked truly unvaccinated controls 12 studies comparing fully vaccinated vs. unvaccinated children found every time that the unvaccinated had far better overall health and dramatically lower autism risk. Biologic mechanisms converged on shared pathways—immune dysregulation, mitochondrial dysfunction, and neuroinflammation—triggered by clustered and early-timed vaccination during critical windows of brain development. By evaluating all known risk factors side by side, this analysis uniquely clarifies the relative contribution of vaccination compared to genetic and environmental domains. No prior review has attempted this integrative scope without excluding positive vaccine-association studies or unvaccinated controls—an essential step in determining whether vaccines truly play a role in autism risk, and if so, how significant that role is within the broader causal landscape. Our report represents a major breakthrough through the iron grip of censorship imposed by the Bio-Pharmaceutical Complex on the issue of vaccination and autism. It also marks Dr. Andrew Wakefield’s first major return to the scientific literature in years—after enduring years of irrational attacks from the vaccine cartel. Thanks to the tireless work of the McCullough Foundation team: Nicolas Hulscher, MPH, John S. Leake, MA, Simon Troupe, MPH, Claire Rogers, MSPAS, PA-C, Kirstin Cosgrove, BM, CCRA, M. Nathaniel Mead, MSc, PhD, Bre Craven, PA-C, Mila Radetich, Andrew Wakefield, MBBS, and Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH — and support from the Bia-Echo Foundation — this historic effort was made possible. CONCLUSION The totality of evidence supports a multifactorial model of ASD in which genetic predisposition, neuroimmune biology, environmental toxicants, perinatal stressors, and iatrogenic exposures converge to produce the phenotype of a post-encephalitic state. Combination and early-timed routine childhood vaccination constitutes the most significant modifiable risk factor for ASD, supported by convergent mechanistic, clinical, and epidemiologic findings, and characterized by intensified use, the clustering of multiple doses during critical neurodevelopmental windows, and the lack of research on the cumulative safety of the full pediatric schedule.

13 Facts
4 Opinions
Read analysis →