@nancymace avatar

@nancymace

@nancymace

X Verified

U.S. Representative for South Carolina's 1st Congressional District (R-SC-01); Candidate for Governor of South Carolina

Domain Expertise:
U.S. PoliticsNational SecurityWomen's Rights and Gender IssuesBorder Security
Detected Biases:
Strong pro-Trump conservatismAnti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric especially on transgender issuesPartisan attacks on Democrats and 'woke' policies
65%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Nancy Mace is a Republican U.S. Congresswoman representing South Carolina's 1st congressional district since 2021. She previously served in the South Carolina State House from 2017 to 2020. Mace is known for her conservative stances on issues like border security, women's rights, and opposition to transgender policies. In 2025, she has been active in promoting her political agenda, including support for Donald Trump, criticism of Democratic policies, and involvement in controversies related to social media posts on gender issues and misinformation. Recent activities include tweeting about national manufacturing day, Yom Kippur, and calling for investigations into local incidents, as well as announcing her gubernatorial candidacy in South Carolina with a focus on anti-woke policies.

How Credible Are They?

65%
Baseline Score

As a sitting Congresswoman, Nancy Mace holds official credibility in legislative and policy discussions, backed by her role in committees on oversight and transportation. However, her social media presence is marred by controversies, including flagged hateful posts, misinformation spreads, and allegations of inauthentic engagement tactics. Her influence is high among Republican audiences but diminished by bias and factual inaccuracies, making her a polarizing figure whose statements require independent verification, particularly on social issues.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Mace's historical accuracy is mixed; she has been fact-checked for spreading baseless claims, such as theories about a shooter linked to Charlie Kirk and details on a USC incident without evidence. Her posts have been flagged for hateful conduct by X, particularly anti-transgender content using slurs. Former staff alleged she used burner accounts for promotion, raising authenticity concerns. While credible on legislative matters, her social media often amplifies partisan narratives with limited verification, leading to corrections and public backlash.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author