@MichelleMaxwell avatar

@MichelleMaxwell

@MichelleMaxwell

Not professionally affiliated; self-describes as working three unspecified jobs

Domain Expertise:
Political commentary (conservative perspective)Social media growth and engagement strategies
Detected Biases:
Strong conservative political alignment (interactions with pro-Trump accounts, anti-narcissist critiques of public figures)Preference for smaller, like-minded accounts in follow-backs
80%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Michelle Maxwell (@MichelleMaxwell) is an active X (formerly Twitter) user who rebuilt her presence on the platform after being banned during the pre-Elon Musk era (Twitter 1.0). She started from zero followers, grew to around 10,000 before the ban, and returned post-2022 acquisition. Her activity focuses on community building, follow-backs (prioritizing small accounts with bios and profile pictures), political shares (often conservative-leaning, e.g., pro-Trump interactions), and tips for account growth. Recent posts (up to November 2025) show ongoing engagement, including shoutouts, algorithm discussions, and reports of follower fluctuations (e.g., losing 400 in an hour, possibly due to bot cleanses). She describes working three jobs, limiting time for interactions.

How Credible Are They?

80%
Baseline Score

Credible as a genuine, engaged X user with organic growth and transparent history (disclosed ban and rebuild). Lacks formal verification, professional credentials, or broad influence, making her suitable for community insights or casual political opinions but not authoritative expertise. No red flags for deception; content consistent across sampled posts with no cross-platform discrepancies.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or controversies found. Tweet patterns are opinion-based shares, reposts, and personal advice; sampled posts emphasize facts in political contexts without evident misinformation. Consistent self-presentation as an organic, non-professional user.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author

Post by @MichelleMaxwell

@MichelleMaxwell

@MichelleMaxwell · Dec 1

85%
Credible

MAJOR DEVELOPMENT: Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong says he may have a treatment that could cure cancer — and former CDC Director Robert Redfield says the FDA needs to “accelerate support” NOW This segment was jaw-dropping. When asked directly if his new IL-15–based therapy could cure cancer, Dr. Soon-Shiong pointed to patients who were near death, had failed multiple treatments, and then suddenly recovered enough to appear on live TV after receiving the therapy. His words: “It passes ‘grandma’s test.’ If your grandma saw a man near death suddenly back on TV, she’d say it’s remarkable.” “This is a message of true hope.” “Every patient deserves a hopeful cancer doctor.” Dr. Soon-Shiong says he and his team have been working on IL-15 for 20+ years, publishing some of the earliest studies on NK-cell activation. Then came CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield — and he did not hold back: “Patrick is onto something.” “The FDA needs to accelerate support of his efforts.” “We must move away from old paradigms.” “If you see 10 people get better, that means something.” Redfield blasted the old cancer-treatment mindset: • Chemotherapy and radiation destroy the immune system • IL-15 therapies are designed to supercharge it • The medical establishment is stuck in outdated “check-the-box” thinking • Trump’s Right to Try Act should have opened the door — but bureaucracy is resisting Redfield even shared his own story, revealing he was diagnosed with cancer this year and rejected chemo and radiation entirely. According to both men, IL-15–activated natural killer cells could be a transformational breakthrough — and the FDA needs to move much faster. This could be one of the most important medical stories of the decade. Is this true @SecKennedy ??

12 Facts
2 Opinions
Read analysis →