@lmkeev avatar

@lmkeev

@lmkeev

Independent social media growth consultant and X content creator

Domain Expertise:
Social media marketingTwitter/X audience growthContent engagement strategies
Detected Biases:
Self-promotional tone in growth narrativesAnecdotal evidence over empirical data
75%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Louis, known on X (formerly Twitter) as @lmkeev, is a social media strategist and content creator focused on helping individuals grow their presence on the platform. He shares practical advice on audience building, engagement strategies, and content optimization. Recent activities include posting threads on the 'Engagement Ladder' system for low-follower accounts and personal growth stories from 7 to 500 followers in weeks. As of late 2025, he continues to publish educational content on X growth tactics, emphasizing sustainable strategies over paid ads.

How Credible Are They?

75%
Baseline Score

@lmkeev demonstrates emerging credibility as a practical guide for X newcomers, backed by transparent personal anecdotes. Lacks formal affiliations or third-party validations, making him more of an influencer than an established expert. Content is helpful for beginners but should be cross-verified with broader analytics tools for accuracy. No red flags for misinformation, but influence is niche and growing.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or controversies found. Content is anecdotal and strategy-based, drawing from personal experience rather than verifiable data sources. Historical posts show consistent focus on growth advice without misleading claims, though self-promotional elements are present.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author

Post by @lmkeev

@lmkeev

@lmkeev · 12h ago

78%
Credible

Stop posting on X. Seriously. If you're under 500 followers, every tweet you publish is not worth the time. Here's what I figured out after wasting weeks making tweets: You're playing the wrong game for your follower count. I call it the "Engagement Ladder". And 90% of people are on the positioning themselves on the wrong rung. The brutal truth: Until you hit critical mass, nobody cares about: → Your morning routine → Your hot takes → Your project updates → Your motivational wisdom They don't care because they don't know you yet. You haven't earned the right to flex. Ever copy a viral tweet from a 50k account and get 2 likes? "Hard work beats talent" gets them 8,000 likes. You post the same thing → 3 likes, 1 from that random account with a picture of a cat. It's not the content. It's the ladder. Here's the actual Engagement Ladder: STAGE 1: 0-500 followers: STOP POSTING. START REPLYING. Your tweets get zero algorithmic reach. You're invisible. So stop screaming into the void. Instead: 100 replies per day to trending posts in your niche. Make yourself visible in OTHER people's comments. That's the only strategy that works at this level. 500-3,000 followers: VALUE ONLY Now you can tweet. But ONLY tactical lessons they can use today. "Here's how I got 1,000 users" "The exact cold email that got 30% replies" "My Cursor setup that saves 10 hours/week" No fluff. No motivation. No "building in public" updates. Nobody cares about your journey (yet). Give them something they can steal. STAGE 2: 3,000-10,000 followers: OPINIONS UNLOCKED Now you can share takes. "Here's why no-code is dead" "Agencies > SaaS for first-time founders" "Y Combinator is overrated" You have enough credibility that people want to hear your POV. But it still needs to teach something. STAGE 3: 10,000-100,000 followers: LIFESTYLE FLEX TIME This is where you can post: → "Coding from a beach in Bali" → "My morning routine as a 6-figure founder" → "What I had for breakfast" People know you now. They're invested in your journey. The mundane becomes interesting because they care about YOU. STAGE 4: 100,000+ followers: POST WHATEVER YOU WANT Politics rants. Random thoughts. Shower wisdom. At this scale, you're a personality. People follow for you, not just your content. Why this matters: Most people try to skip rungs. They're at 800 followers posting: "Building in public! Day 47 of my SaaS journey " Zero engagement. Meanwhile, someone with 80k posts the same thing and gets 500 likes. Same content. Different rung. The mistake I see everywhere: People at 1,000 followers trying to post like they're at 50k. Motivational quotes. Morning routines. Hot takes on politics. Nobody cares. You haven't earned that yet. What actually works: Match your content to your rung: Under 500? Don't post. Just engage. 500-3k? You're a teacher, not a personality. Teach. Give tactical value. Make them smarter in 60 seconds. Save the flexing for when you have 10k+. The controversial part: Those "inspiring" tweets from big accounts? They're not what got them big. They got big by providing insane value when they were small. Now they've earned the right to post lazy motivation. You haven't. Based on my learning of this platform: Stop trying to be motivational. Stop sharing your "journey." Stop posting your hot takes. If you're under 500 (lik me), stop posting completely. Just reply. If you're 500-3k, stop posting anything that isn't pure value. Until you're over 3,000 followers, you're invisible. So give value so good they can't ignore you. Teach them something worth stealing. Every. Single. Tweet. The Engagement Ladder is real. Know which rung you're on. Or keep wondering why your posts get 3 likes while the same content from big accounts gets 3,000.

3 Facts
20 Opinions
Read analysis →