@KonstantinKisin avatar

@KonstantinKisin

@KonstantinKisin

Co-host of Triggernometry podcast; political commentator and author

Domain Expertise:
Political commentaryCultural criticismComedy and satireFree speech advocacy
Detected Biases:
Conservative-leaning anti-woke perspectiveCriticism of mainstream media and left-leaning institutionsPro-free speech and libertarian influences
82%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Konstantin Kisin is a Russian-British political commentator, author, stand-up comedian, and co-host of the Triggernometry podcast with Francis Foster. Born in 1982 in Moscow, he moved to the UK as a teenager and has Ukrainian, Greek, and Jewish ancestry. He gained prominence through his podcast, which discusses politics, culture, and comedy, often critiquing 'woke' ideologies and identity politics. Kisin has written for publications like Quillette, The Spectator, and The Daily Telegraph. He has appeared on BBC Question Time, Sky News, and GB News. Recent activities include speaking at conferences like ARC, publishing on Substack, and engaging in high-profile Twitter debates on topics like Ukraine, BBC bias, and cultural issues as of 2025.

How Credible Are They?

82%
Baseline Score

Kisin is a credible voice in political and cultural commentary, particularly for audiences skeptical of progressive ideologies, backed by his podcast's popularity and media appearances. His work is insightful and well-researched but inherently biased toward conservative critiques, which may polarize views. No evidence of deliberate misinformation, but engagement-driven Twitter activity amplifies opinion over neutral reporting. Overall, reliable for opinion analysis but should be cross-verified for factual claims.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Kisin's commentary is primarily opinion-based, drawing from personal experiences and public debates, with no major fact-check retractions identified. He has been involved in controversies, such as criticisms of 'woke culture' leading to viral speeches and backlash, and accusations of shifting views on Ukraine due to 'audience capture' (which he denies). Historical accuracy appears solid in podcast discussions and writings, though subjective interpretations on topics like identity politics have drawn partisan critiques without proven falsehoods.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author