@jason_howerton avatar

@jason_howerton

@jason_howerton

Journalist and contributor at Business Insider, Yahoo, and The Daily Caller

Domain Expertise:
Conservative politicsDigital journalismChristian commentary
Detected Biases:
Strong conservative political leaningsExplicit Christian worldview influencing opinions
82%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Jason Howerton is a journalist and conservative commentator with a long history in digital media. He has worked at outlets like TheBlaze, Independent Journal Review, and currently contributes to Business Insider, Yahoo, and The Daily Caller. His Twitter activity focuses on political commentary, Christian faith, family life, and critiques of liberal policies. Recent activities include posts on U.S. politics, religious themes, and cultural issues as of late 2025, with high-engagement content criticizing corporate practices and promoting biblical principles. His account appears active since at least 2016, though exact creation date is around 2010 based on early professional mentions.

How Credible Are They?

82%
Baseline Score

Howerton is a credible journalist with a conservative bias, reliable for opinion and analysis in politics and culture. His work at established outlets like Business Insider bolsters legitimacy, though Twitter posts blend personal faith and partisanship, potentially polarizing audiences. No evidence of misinformation campaigns or disputes; cross-platform consistency enhances trust, but users should cross-verify opinionated claims.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Howerton has a solid track record in journalism without major fact-check failures or corrections noted in public records. He transitioned from conservative outlets like TheBlaze to more mainstream ones like Business Insider, maintaining accuracy in reporting. No significant controversies or retractions found; his commentary is opinion-based but grounded in verifiable events. Some older viral content, like a 2019 Lego socialism analogy, was clarified as satirical, but no deceptive intent.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author