@his_eminence_j avatar

@his_eminence_j

@his_eminence_j

Independent commentator (no formal affiliations disclosed)

Domain Expertise:
EconomicsFinancial MarketsPolitical Commentary
Detected Biases:
Conservative political slantAnti-progressive sarcasmPro-free market advocacy
65%
Average Truthfulness
2
Posts Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

The Twitter account @his_eminence_j, displaying as 'Uncle Milty’s Ghost', is an anonymous profile centered on economic analysis, financial market commentary, and conservative political opinions. Active since at least 2022, it posts regularly on topics like bond markets, economic trends, political critiques, and cultural issues. Recent activities as of November 2025 include discussions on K-shaped economies, tech hype skepticism, and criticisms of progressive policies, with a sarcastic and opinionated tone. The account shows no signs of inactivity and maintains consistent engagement on current events.

How Credible Are They?

65%
Baseline Score

@his_eminence_j offers engaging, niche insights into economics and politics but operates as an unverified, anonymous voice with clear ideological bias. While tweet patterns show consistent activity and variable engagement (higher on financial topics), the absence of professional affiliations, fact-check history, or cross-platform verification limits reliability for objective analysis. Best viewed as opinionated commentary rather than authoritative source; potential for misinformation in unsubstantiated predictions.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or major controversies; posts blend factual market data with interpretive opinions and predictions, such as economic hard landings or financial brewing trends. Historical accuracy appears speculative rather than rigorously sourced, with a track record of unverified claims in political rants. Credibility is undermined by anonymity and lack of professional sourcing, though some financial insights align with broader market sentiments without errors noted.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author