@hakluke avatar

@hakluke

@hakluke

Founder of a cybersecurity-focused marketing agency offering social media management, content creation (blogs, whitepapers, CTF challenges), webinars, and SEO services

Domain Expertise:
Cybersecurity and Penetration TestingOpen-Source Intelligence (OSINT)Bug Bounty Hunting and Ethical HackingSocial Media Strategy for Infosec Businesses
Detected Biases:
Strong advocacy for ethical cybersecurity practices, potentially downplaying non-technical aspectsPromotion of personal business services in recent posts, which may introduce commercial bias in recommendations
88%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

Luke Stephens, known online as @hakluke, is a cybersecurity professional active on X (formerly Twitter) since at least 2019 based on archived posts. He focuses on open-source intelligence (OSINT), penetration testing, bug bounty hunting, and content creation in the infosec space. Recent activities as of October 2025 include promoting his cybersecurity marketing business, writing guest blogs for platforms like Bugcrowd on OSINT techniques, participating in events like HackerOne discussions, and sharing tools and tips for aspiring hackers. He emphasizes ethical practices and warns against manufactured social proof in cybersecurity communities.

How Credible Are They?

88%
Baseline Score

High credibility within the cybersecurity niche; @hakluke appears as a knowledgeable practitioner sharing actionable insights without evident misinformation or scandals. His unverified status is common for technical experts, and engagement metrics suggest genuine influence among peers. Lacks broad mainstream verification but maintains consistency across platforms, with no red flags in truthfulness or affiliations.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or controversies found; historical posts demonstrate practical, verifiable advice on cybersecurity topics like OSINT tools and pentesting findings, with links to GitHub repositories and blogs that align with industry standards; consistent promotion of ethical hacking without misleading claims, building credibility through community engagement rather than hype

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author

Post by @hakluke

@hakluke

@hakluke · Oct 22

88%
Credible

I just solved the strangest tech problem I've ever come across. My wifi kept dropping packets, confirmed by ping. It would look something like the first image (packets dropping, then it comes back to life). After a while the connection would just stop working completely and drop all packets. If I turned my wifi off and on again, it would resume working normally. I thought this was a problem with my router, cables or ISP, so I went through the usual troubleshooting processes: checking settings, swapping cables, powercycling, etc. nothing worked. Eventually I started noticing that it would only happen when I sat in my office. I was taking a video meeting and it kept dropping segments of audio, making it hard to understand the other person. I unplugged my laptop from my monitor + keyboard because I wanted to try walking into another room. Immediately, the video started working perfectly. I thought it was because I was a few steps closer to my router - but that didn't really make sense because the router had always worked fine from that location. I started thinking about what I'd changed in my desk setup recently, the only thing I could think of was when I changed from using a USB-C <-> DP cable for my monitor, to using a HDMI <-> HDMI cable. I tried plugging my screen back in. Immediately, the packets started dropping. I unplugged it, the dropping stopped. It turns out my HDMI cable doesn't have enough shielding, so it was jamming my own WiFi signal with radio frequency interference I unrolled the HDMI cable that was sitting behind my laptop and draped the main length of the cord down behind my desk, and now my internet works perfectly. Apparently this is a fairly common issue?!

13 Facts
3 Opinions
Read analysis →