@GMJacobAagaard

Who Is This Person?

Jacob Aagaard is a Danish chess Grandmaster (GM), author, trainer, and publisher known for his contributions to chess literature and education. He holds the FIDE title of GM since 2004 and has authored numerous books on chess strategy, tactics, and endgames through his publishing house, Quality Chess. As of 2025, he remains active in the chess community, contributing to New in Chess magazine, conducting training sessions, and participating in online chess events like Titled Tuesday on Chess.com. Recent activities include promoting chess books, commenting on chess controversies (e.g., disputes with Vladimir Kramnik), and engaging in Danish political discussions on social media. His Twitter account, @GMJacobAagaard, created around 2010 (exact date not publicly detailed but active since early 2010s based on archived posts), features a mix of chess insights, book promotions, travel updates from chess tours, and personal opinions on politics and society.

Jacob Aagaard is highly credible as a chess expert, with decades of professional output including award-winning books and training roles for top players. His Twitter presence reinforces this through insightful chess commentary and affiliations with reputable organizations like New in Chess. While political posts introduce subjective bias, they do not appear to spread falsehoods, and no major controversies undermine his overall reliability. Influence is niche but respected; recommended for chess topics, with caution for political opinions.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

High accuracy in chess-related content, with books and analyses praised for depth and reliability by peers (e.g., no major fact-checks or corrections in professional chess circles). Involved in a 2024 controversy with GM Vladimir Kramnik over online game accusations, where Aagaard defended his play publicly, leading to community debate but no formal fact-checks disproving his claims. Political tweets (often in Danish) express opinions without evident misinformation, though they lack sourcing; overall, a strong track record of credibility in expertise domain, with occasional opinionated statements outside chess.