@DewyGrassBlades avatar

@DewyGrassBlades

@DewyGrassBlades

No professional job title or affiliation mentioned; appears to be an independent social media user without disclosed formal roles.

Domain Expertise:
U.S. PoliticsSocial Media EngagementConservative Commentary
Detected Biases:
Conservative political leanings evident in criticisms of Democratic figures and support for right-leaning narrativesFocus on anti-establishment and accountability themes in government-related posts
70%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

The Twitter account @DewyGrassBlades, operated under the display name 'Grass ๐ŸŒฟ', appears to be a personal account focused on political commentary, social media discussions, and conservative-leaning opinions. Active since at least May 2023 (earliest available post), the account engages frequently with high-profile users and topics such as U.S. politics, government accountability, and platform algorithms. Recent activities as of October 2025 include posts critiquing political figures, sharing views on immigration policies, and emphasizing authentic engagement over superficial metrics like likes. No evidence of account suspension or major changes in activity patterns. The account was likely created prior to 2023, but exact creation date is not publicly detailed in available sources.

How Credible Are They?

70%
Baseline Score

As an unverified personal account, @DewyGrassBlades demonstrates low to moderate credibility primarily as an opinion commentator rather than a journalistic or expert source. Engagement patterns indicate genuine user interaction without bot-like behavior, and absence of controversies supports a clean track record. However, the conservative bias and lack of professional affiliations limit objectivity, making it suitable for gauging public sentiment but not for authoritative facts. Cross-platform consistency cannot be assessed due to limited presence elsewhere.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

No documented fact-checks, corrections, or controversies associated with the account. Posts are primarily opinion-based, with no evident spread of verifiable misinformation in sampled tweets. Historical activity shows consistent political engagement without patterns of retraction or disputes, suggesting moderate reliability for personal views but not for factual reporting.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author