@bmj_latest avatar

@bmj_latest

@bmj_latest

Official social media account for The BMJ journal, managed by BMJ Publishing Group

Domain Expertise:
Medical research and publishingHealthcare policy and NHS analysisClinical practice and patient safety
Detected Biases:
Focus on UK-centric healthcare issues (e.g., NHS advocacy)Emphasis on evidence-based medicine and professional candour, potentially critical of policy shortcomings
95%
Average Truthfulness
1
Post Analyzed

Who Is This Person?

The @bmj_latest Twitter account is the official handle for The BMJ (British Medical Journal), a leading peer-reviewed medical journal published by BMJ Publishing Group, a subsidiary of the British Medical Association. Established as a key source for medical research, clinical updates, and healthcare policy discussions, the account shares breaking news, article links, opinions, and insights primarily focused on UK healthcare (NHS), global medicine, and evidence-based practice. It has been active for over a decade, with posts dating back to at least 2013 based on referenced studies and analyses. Recent activities as of November 2025 include coverage of NHS consultant vacancies, medical student engagement amid strikes, speaking up culture in healthcare, and critiques of government health policies, maintaining a consistent output of 5-10 tweets per week linking to bmj.com content.

How Credible Are They?

95%
Baseline Score

Highly credible as the official outlet for a globally respected medical journal with over 180 years of history. The account demonstrates consistent, professional tweet patterns centered on factual reporting and sourced content, with high engagement from verified medical professionals. No evidence of misinformation; affiliations are transparently tied to BMJ Group. Influence metrics show it as a key node in medical Twitter networks, with cross-platform consistency reinforcing reliability. Potential biases are institutional (pro-evidence, pro-transparency) rather than partisan, making it a trusted source for healthcare information.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

The BMJ has a strong history of accuracy as a peer-reviewed journal, with rigorous editorial standards and fact-checking processes. The Twitter account mirrors this by linking directly to published articles. Minor controversies include a 2022 incident where Facebook incorrectly labeled a BMJ investigation on Pfizer vaccine trials as 'missing context,' leading to temporary censorship, but the article was upheld as accurate after review by fact-checkers like Full Fact. No widespread corrections or retractions tied to the account; instead, it promotes transparency, such as critiques of NHS data practices and government communications.

What Have We Analyzed?

Recent posts and claims we've fact-checked from this author