@ABridgen

Who Is This Person?

Andrew Bridgen is a British politician and former Member of Parliament (MP) for North West Leicestershire, initially elected as a Conservative in 2010. He was suspended from the Conservative Party in 2023 following controversial statements comparing COVID-19 vaccination policies to the Holocaust, leading him to sit as an independent MP. In the 2024 general election, he lost his seat to Labour but remains active in public discourse, particularly on social media. As of 2025, he continues to comment on UK politics, immigration, government overreach, and cultural issues via his X (Twitter) account @ABridgen, with recent posts criticizing policies on pubs, public safety in London, and dystopian surveillance trends. His activities include engaging with other right-leaning figures and promoting direct democracy ideas.

Andrew Bridgen possesses domain knowledge in UK politics from his long parliamentary career, making him a credible voice on legislative processes and constituency issues. However, his credibility is significantly diminished by a history of controversial, fact-checked statements that veer into misinformation, particularly on sensitive topics like vaccines and cultural enrichment. His X activity amplifies biased, alarmist narratives with solid engagement among like-minded followers, but lacks balance or sourcing, suggesting selective truthfulness. Overall, treat his claims with caution, verifying independently; suitable for understanding conservative viewpoints but not as a primary reliable source.

Assessment by Grok AI

What's Their Track Record?

Bridgen's historical accuracy is mixed; while he has raised legitimate concerns on issues like government spending and local constituency matters during his MP tenure, he has faced multiple fact-checks and controversies for unsubstantiated claims. Notable instances include his 2023 Holocaust comparison, debunked by fact-checkers like Full Fact for misinformation on vaccines, and repeated promotions of conspiracy-adjacent narratives on COVID-19 and immigration without strong evidence. No major corrections issued by him, but suspensions and media scrutiny highlight credibility challenges. Positive track record in parliamentary scrutiny, but overall undermined by sensationalism.