81% credible (87% factual, 72% presentation). The claim of wrongful YouTube channel termination aligns with documented issues of YouTube's AI systems issuing false terminations in late 2025, supported by similar cases among animation creators. However, the presentation lacks verifiable details such as the channel name and appeal specifics, resulting in omission framing that penalizes credibility.
An animation creator reports their channel with over 650,000 subscribers being terminated on November 13 for alleged spam or scam, despite original content creation, with a rapid appeal rejection suggesting automated processing. Recent reports indicate widespread false terminations by YouTube's AI systems affecting creators, supporting the plausibility of this claim. The post calls for human review and community support, highlighting a broader issue impacting original content makers.
The claim aligns with numerous recent reports of YouTube's automated systems issuing false terminations for spam or deceptive practices, particularly affecting original content creators in late 2025, including quick appeal rejections that suggest AI involvement rather than human review. No evidence contradicts the personal account, and search results confirm similar cases among animation and gaming channels. Verdict: Highly plausible, supported by platform-wide issues.
The post advances a perspective of injustice against original creators, emphasizing personal devastation and calling for community action and platform intervention to highlight systemic flaws in YouTube's moderation. It frames the termination as an 'unfair mistake' driven by AI, while omitting specific details like the channel name, URL, or exact appeal text, which could allow independent verification and might shape perception toward emotional sympathy over factual scrutiny. This selective presentation amplifies urgency and solidarity among creators, potentially downplaying any nuanced policy violations.
Images included in the original content
A stylized red YouTube play button icon with white circular eyes, overlaid with yellow caution tape labeled 'BANNEDDED' in black text, set against a dark blue background; the design appears cartoonish and meme-like to symbolize a ban.
BANNEDDED
No signs of photo editing, deepfakes, or inconsistencies; it is a digital graphic creation, likely generated or edited in software like Photoshop for illustrative purposes, with no artifacts indicating forgery.
The image is a generic symbolic representation without dates, timestamps, or time-specific elements; it does not claim to be from a particular event or period.
No location is claimed or depicted; the image is an abstract icon without geographical clues.
The image symbolically represents a YouTube ban but does not purport to show real evidence; reverse image search reveals similar memes used in discussions of platform bans, confirming it's a common illustrative trope rather than unique proof.
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Problematic phrases:
"please help now, You might be next.""If you are seeing this please Like, Comment and Retweet."What's actually there:
What's implied:
Impact: Instills fear of personal risk, prompting hasty support without reflection on the specifics or broader context.
Problematic phrases:
"My original animation channel was terminated"What's actually there:
no identifiers provided
What's implied:
readily verifiable personal story
Impact: Shifts focus to sympathy and solidarity, reducing scrutiny and potentially misleading readers about the claim's substantiation.
Problematic phrases:
"while thieves using my content stay up."What's actually there:
no specifics on theft or policy violations
What's implied:
pure injustice without user fault
Impact: Reinforces a narrative of unfair targeting, downplaying any legitimate moderation reasons and biasing toward outrage.
Problematic phrases:
"There are many creators facing this false wrongful ban."What's actually there:
plausible trend per context
What's implied:
mounting crisis affecting all
Impact: Creates a sense of inevitable pattern, encouraging collective action by exaggerating interconnectedness.
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1fvjb2p/my_youtube_channel_was_removed_for_spam_and_scam/
https://www.reddit.com/r/PartneredYoutube/comments/1nh06qi/youtube_channel_terminated_for_spam_deceptive/
https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1k1ttmv/my_youtube_channel_of_21k_subs_was_terminated_for/
https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802168?hl=en
https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1ay4pc6/my_channel_was_suspended_because_youtube_found/
https://mashable.com/article/big-youtube-channels-terminated-creators-blame-ai
https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/04/youtube-apologizes-for-falsely-banning-channels-for-spam-canceling-subscriptions/
https://ppc.land/youtube-addresses-creator-concerns-on-content-moderation-and-appeals
https://ppc.land/youtube-creators-challenge-platforms-claims-of-manual-appeal-reviews
https://dexerto.com/youtube/youtubers-report-widespread-channel-terminations-and-strikes-with-no-warning-3280796
https://sportskeeda.com/us/streamers/youtube-falsely-terminating-creators-channels-controversy-what-exactly-happened
https://creatorhandbook.net/multiple-creators-raise-alarms-as-youtube-issues-sudden-terminations-and-strikes-without-warning
https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/Termination
https://9to5google.com/2024/10/04/youtube-ban-channel-removal/
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1192230882767060994
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1955200952639561785
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1866270917669642363
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1090687940735381504
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1105586301003153408
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1974152178961895682
https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1fvjb2p/my_youtube_channel_was_removed_for_spam_and_scam/
https://www.dexerto.com/youtube/youtubers-report-widespread-channel-terminations-and-strikes-with-no-warning-3280796/
https://mashable.com/article/big-youtube-channels-terminated-creators-blame-ai
https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/04/youtube-apologizes-for-falsely-banning-channels-for-spam-canceling-subscriptions/
https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1ay4pc6/my_channel_was_suspended_because_youtube_found/
https://piunikaweb.com/2025/11/14/youtube-ai-bans-backlash-response/
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42917454
https://ppc.land/youtube-addresses-creator-concerns-on-content-moderation-and-appeals/
https://ppc.land/google-terminates-over-18-500-channels-in-q3-2025-influence-operations
https://medium.com/@waqas1bikshi007/youtube-17-november-2025-policy-update-new-rules-and-restrictions-for-creators-a680beca6244
https://amkstation.com/widespread-youtuber-channel-terminations-and-strikes-reported-without-warning
https://digiarun.com/resources/youtube-policy-circumvention-termination-2025
https://dtptips.com/🎥-youtubes-3-major-updates-october-2025-big-news-for-terminated-channels-medical-misinformation-policy
https://sigmastory.in/youtube-circumvention-policy-channel-deletion-and-protection-guidelines/
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1943062275016794153
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1971241768176783804
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1866270917669642363
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1971234736996597974
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1990472200302796982
https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1943081724763611442
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements