81%
Credible

Post by @mister_manners_

@mister_manners_
@mister_manners_
@mister_manners_

81% credible (87% factual, 72% presentation). The claim of wrongful YouTube channel termination aligns with documented issues of YouTube's AI systems issuing false terminations in late 2025, supported by similar cases among animation creators. However, the presentation lacks verifiable details such as the channel name and appeal specifics, resulting in omission framing that penalizes credibility.

87%
Factual claims accuracy
72%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

An animation creator reports their channel with over 650,000 subscribers being terminated on November 13 for alleged spam or scam, despite original content creation, with a rapid appeal rejection suggesting automated processing. Recent reports indicate widespread false terminations by YouTube's AI systems affecting creators, supporting the plausibility of this claim. The post calls for human review and community support, highlighting a broader issue impacting original content makers.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
I'm devastated. A heartbreaking News for every creator. My original animation channel was terminated for "Spam/Scam" on Nov 13, despite every video being 100% created by me (modeling, rigging, animation took 2-4 days each!). ​My appeal was rejected in 5 mins. I desperately request a proper human review. My content is original, not spam. My channel is my Career but it's been terminated and destroyed wrongly. My life's work is gone, while thieves using my content stay up. 650000+ subs and the whole work disappeared overnight. If you are seeing this please Like, Comment and Retweet. There are many creators facing this false wrongful ban. If you are a creator please help now, You might be next .Please, @YouTubeCreators & @TeamYouTube , this is an unfair mistake. #YouTubeTerminated #YouTubeAIWrongedCreators #Animation #FairReview

The Facts

The claim aligns with numerous recent reports of YouTube's automated systems issuing false terminations for spam or deceptive practices, particularly affecting original content creators in late 2025, including quick appeal rejections that suggest AI involvement rather than human review. No evidence contradicts the personal account, and search results confirm similar cases among animation and gaming channels. Verdict: Highly plausible, supported by platform-wide issues.

Benefit of the Doubt

The post advances a perspective of injustice against original creators, emphasizing personal devastation and calling for community action and platform intervention to highlight systemic flaws in YouTube's moderation. It frames the termination as an 'unfair mistake' driven by AI, while omitting specific details like the channel name, URL, or exact appeal text, which could allow independent verification and might shape perception toward emotional sympathy over factual scrutiny. This selective presentation amplifies urgency and solidarity among creators, potentially downplaying any nuanced policy violations.

Visual Content Analysis

Images included in the original content

A stylized red YouTube play button icon with white circular eyes, overlaid with yellow caution tape labeled 'BANNEDDED' in black text, set against a dark blue background; the design appears cartoonish and meme-like to symbolize a ban.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A stylized red YouTube play button icon with white circular eyes, overlaid with yellow caution tape labeled 'BANNEDDED' in black text, set against a dark blue background; the design appears cartoonish and meme-like to symbolize a ban.

TEXT IN IMAGE

BANNEDDED

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No signs of photo editing, deepfakes, or inconsistencies; it is a digital graphic creation, likely generated or edited in software like Photoshop for illustrative purposes, with no artifacts indicating forgery.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

unknown

The image is a generic symbolic representation without dates, timestamps, or time-specific elements; it does not claim to be from a particular event or period.

LOCATION ACCURACY

unknown

No location is claimed or depicted; the image is an abstract icon without geographical clues.

FACT-CHECK

The image symbolically represents a YouTube ban but does not purport to show real evidence; reverse image search reveals similar memes used in discussions of platform bans, confirming it's a common illustrative trope rather than unique proof.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

mediumurgency: artificial urgency

Presents the issue as an immediate crisis requiring instant community action, heightening emotional pressure despite the event occurring weeks prior.

Problematic phrases:

"please help now, You might be next.""If you are seeing this please Like, Comment and Retweet."

What's actually there:

What's implied:

Impact: Instills fear of personal risk, prompting hasty support without reflection on the specifics or broader context.

highomission: missing context

Fails to include verifiable details like channel name, URL, or appeal specifics, hindering fact-checking and allowing unchecked emotional appeal.

Problematic phrases:

"My original animation channel was terminated"

What's actually there:

no identifiers provided

What's implied:

readily verifiable personal story

Impact: Shifts focus to sympathy and solidarity, reducing scrutiny and potentially misleading readers about the claim's substantiation.

mediumomission: unreported counter evidence

Mentions thieves using content but omits any platform policies or evidence of why the channel might have triggered spam flags, ignoring possible nuances.

Problematic phrases:

"while thieves using my content stay up."

What's actually there:

no specifics on theft or policy violations

What's implied:

pure injustice without user fault

Impact: Reinforces a narrative of unfair targeting, downplaying any legitimate moderation reasons and biasing toward outrage.

lowsequence: false pattern

Uses language implying a growing wave of terminations to frame the personal case as part of a systemic epidemic, though supported by reports, it amplifies perception beyond isolated evidence.

Problematic phrases:

"There are many creators facing this false wrongful ban."

What's actually there:

plausible trend per context

What's implied:

mounting crisis affecting all

Impact: Creates a sense of inevitable pattern, encouraging collective action by exaggerating interconnectedness.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1fvjb2p/my_youtube_channel_was_removed_for_spam_and_scam/

2

https://www.reddit.com/r/PartneredYoutube/comments/1nh06qi/youtube_channel_terminated_for_spam_deceptive/

3

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1k1ttmv/my_youtube_channel_of_21k_subs_was_terminated_for/

4

https://support.google.com/youtube/answer/2802168?hl=en

5

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1ay4pc6/my_channel_was_suspended_because_youtube_found/

6

https://mashable.com/article/big-youtube-channels-terminated-creators-blame-ai

7

https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/04/youtube-apologizes-for-falsely-banning-channels-for-spam-canceling-subscriptions/

8

https://ppc.land/youtube-addresses-creator-concerns-on-content-moderation-and-appeals

9

https://ppc.land/youtube-creators-challenge-platforms-claims-of-manual-appeal-reviews

10

https://dexerto.com/youtube/youtubers-report-widespread-channel-terminations-and-strikes-with-no-warning-3280796

11

https://sportskeeda.com/us/streamers/youtube-falsely-terminating-creators-channels-controversy-what-exactly-happened

12

https://creatorhandbook.net/multiple-creators-raise-alarms-as-youtube-issues-sudden-terminations-and-strikes-without-warning

13

https://youtube.fandom.com/wiki/Termination

14

https://9to5google.com/2024/10/04/youtube-ban-channel-removal/

15

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1192230882767060994

16

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1955200952639561785

17

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1866270917669642363

18

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1090687940735381504

19

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1105586301003153408

20

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1974152178961895682

21

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1fvjb2p/my_youtube_channel_was_removed_for_spam_and_scam/

22

https://www.dexerto.com/youtube/youtubers-report-widespread-channel-terminations-and-strikes-with-no-warning-3280796/

23

https://mashable.com/article/big-youtube-channels-terminated-creators-blame-ai

24

https://techcrunch.com/2024/10/04/youtube-apologizes-for-falsely-banning-channels-for-spam-canceling-subscriptions/

25

https://www.reddit.com/r/NewTubers/comments/1ay4pc6/my_channel_was_suspended_because_youtube_found/

26

https://piunikaweb.com/2025/11/14/youtube-ai-bans-backlash-response/

27

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42917454

28

https://ppc.land/youtube-addresses-creator-concerns-on-content-moderation-and-appeals/

29

https://ppc.land/google-terminates-over-18-500-channels-in-q3-2025-influence-operations

30

https://medium.com/@waqas1bikshi007/youtube-17-november-2025-policy-update-new-rules-and-restrictions-for-creators-a680beca6244

31

https://amkstation.com/widespread-youtuber-channel-terminations-and-strikes-reported-without-warning

32

https://digiarun.com/resources/youtube-policy-circumvention-termination-2025

33

https://dtptips.com/🎥-youtubes-3-major-updates-october-2025-big-news-for-terminated-channels-medical-misinformation-policy

34

https://sigmastory.in/youtube-circumvention-policy-channel-deletion-and-protection-guidelines/

35

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1943062275016794153

36

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1971241768176783804

37

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1866270917669642363

38

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1971234736996597974

39

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1990472200302796982

40

https://x.com/TeamYouTube/status/1943081724763611442

Want to see @mister_manners_'s track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

6
Facts
4
Opinions
2
Emotive
0
Predictions