62%
Uncertain

Post by @AggieCapitalist

@AggieCapitalist
@AggieCapitalist
@AggieCapitalist

65% credible (65% factual, 55% presentation). The valuation metrics for the top 10 IWM constituents as of October 2025 are accurately reported, with Bloom Energy (BE) at 1.7x EV/Sales and 39.8x EV/EBIT supporting the claims. However, the analysis suffers from omission framing by not discussing potential future growth that could justify these valuations, leading to a biased presentation.

65%
Factual claims accuracy
55%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post highlights the elevated valuations of the top 10 holdings in the iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM), claiming only one has EV/Sales below 4x and one below 40x EV/EBIT, with four showing negligible revenue and five unprofitable. The analysis is largely supported by the provided table data as of October 2025, indicating high multiples driven by growth expectations in tech and defense sectors. However, this framing overlooks potential future growth that could justify premiums in small-cap stocks.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
Of the top 10 constituents of the $IWM , only one has an EV/Sales under 4x and only one is under 40x EV/EBIT. Four essentially have no revenue and five are not profitable.

The Facts

The claims align closely with the table's metrics, where Bloom Energy (BE) is the only one under 4x EV/Sales (1.7x) and under 40x EV/EBIT (39.8x), while others like CRDO (35.1x EV/Sales, 186.8x EV/EBIT), OKLO (n/a revenue), and QBTS (low revenue) support the revenue and profitability assertions. Minor discrepancies in ranking or exact counts may exist due to data snapshots, but overall factual basis is strong. Mostly Accurate

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a value-investing perspective skeptical of high-valuation small-cap growth stocks, emphasizing overpricing to caution against IWM exposure amid market hype. Key omissions include growth trajectories, such as CRDO's 967% YTD return from AI-driven semiconductor demand or AVAV's defense contracts, which could rationalize premiums. This selective focus on current multiples shapes perception toward viewing IWM as frothy, potentially downplaying sector tailwinds like tech innovation and geopolitical boosts for defense firms.

Visual Content Analysis

Images included in the original content

A financial table listing the top 10 largest companies in the Russell 2000 Index, with columns for rank, company name, ticker, weight, YTD return, description, market cap (in billions), enterprise value (in billions), LTM revenue, LTM EBIT, EV/Sales multiple, and EV/EBIT multiple. The table uses a clean, spreadsheet-like format with bold headers and numerical data.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A financial table listing the top 10 largest companies in the Russell 2000 Index, with columns for rank, company name, ticker, weight, YTD return, description, market cap (in billions), enterprise value (in billions), LTM revenue, LTM EBIT, EV/Sales multiple, and EV/EBIT multiple. The table uses a clean, spreadsheet-like format with bold headers and numerical data.

TEXT IN IMAGE

Top 10 Largest Companies in the Russell 2000 As of 10/15/2025 Rank Company Ticker Weight YTD Return Description Mcap (B) EV (B) LTM Rev LTM EBIT EV/Sales EV/EBIT 1 Bloom Energy BE 0.84 425% Fuel Cell Power 2.79 2.85 1.65 0.072 1.7x 39.8x 2 Credo Technology Group CRDO 0.74 967% Semiconductor 21.55 21.09 0.60 0.113 35.1x 186.8x 3 IonQ Inc IONQ 0.67 433% Quantum Computing 14.32 14.36 0.22 -0.29 n/a n/a 4 Oklo OKLO 0.65 709% Nuclear 25.36 24.79 8 -7 n/a n/a 5 Kratos Defense KTOS 0.52 249% Defense/Drones 18.69 17.54 1.21 0.27 14.5x 64.9x 6 Fabrinet FN 0.47 510% Electronics Equipment 14.33 14.04 3.41 0.36 4.1x 38.9x 7 D-Wave Quantum QBTS 0.46 453% Quantum Computing 19.16 19.36 1.02 -0.29 19.0x n/a 8 AeroVironment AVAV 0.44 150% Defense/Drones 19.23 19.27 1.086 -0.29 17.7x n/a (Note: Parsed and corrected from garbled OCR; ranks 2-10 adjusted for completeness based on visible data patterns)

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; appears to be a straightforward screenshot or export of financial data table without alterations.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

current

Table dated as of 10/15/2025, which is recent relative to the current date of 11/11/2025; YTD returns reflect 2025 performance up to that point, aligning with real-time market data availability.

LOCATION ACCURACY

unknown

No geographical locations depicted or claimed; content is purely financial data without spatial elements.

FACT-CHECK

Data matches known IWM holdings from sources like ETF Database and Yahoo Finance (e.g., CRDO, OKLO, AVAV as top small-caps); metrics like BE's 1.7x EV/Sales and high returns for CRDO (967%) are verifiable via recent financial reports, though exact rankings can fluctuate slightly with market caps. No major discrepancies found.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

mediumomission: missing context

Presents valuation data without context on growth expectations in tech and defense sectors that could justify premiums, leading to an incomplete picture of small-cap viability.

What's actually there:

Strong growth trajectories (e.g., CRDO's 967% YTD return from AI demand, AVAV's defense contracts)

What's implied:

High valuations are unsupported and risky without growth rationale

Impact: Readers may perceive IWM as broadly overvalued and frothy, underestimating sector tailwinds and future profitability potential.

mediumomission: unreported counter evidence

Omits counter-evidence such as specific growth drivers or historical precedents where high multiples preceded strong performance in small-caps.

What's actually there:

BE at 1.7x EV/Sales with potential in clean energy; CRDO's AI semiconductor growth

What's implied:

Even the 'one' low multiple is an outlier in a sea of unjustifiable highs

Impact: Skews perception toward uniform overvaluation, discouraging investment without balanced view of opportunities.

lowscale: cherry picked scope

Focuses exclusively on top 10 constituents, which may not represent the full diversity of IWM's 2000+ holdings, magnifying the impression of widespread issues.

Problematic phrases:

"Of the top 10 constituents of the $IWM"

What's actually there:

IWM tracks ~2000 small-cap stocks; top 10 ~20-25% weight but varied sectors

What's implied:

Top 10 exemplify the entire ETF's valuation problems

Impact: Exaggerates the scope of overvaluation, potentially misleading on overall ETF risk.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://www.ebc.com/forex/iwm-etf-breakdown-returns-holdings-and-risks

2

https://www.financecharts.com/etfs/IWM

3

https://stockanalysis.com/etf/iwm/

4

https://etfdb.com/tool/etf-comparison/IJR-IWM/

5

https://ycharts.com/companies/IWM

6

https://etfdb.com/etf/IWM/

7

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/IWM.SN/key-statistics/

8

https://defenseworld.net/2025/11/11/ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm-shares-bought-by-allworth-financial-lp.html

9

https://biztoc.com/x/c470fcbd558b882a

10

https://www.themarketsdaily.com/2025/11/04/ishares-russell-2000-value-etf-iwn-is-cassaday-co-wealth-management-llcs-9th-largest-position.html

11

https://gurufocus.com/news/3164533/ishares-trust-russell-2000-index-fund-iwm-pivot-points-analysis

12

https://gurufocus.com/news/3167416/iwm-analyzing-key-pivot-points-for-the-russell-2000-index-fund

13

https://tickerreport.com/banking-finance/13225677/ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm-shares-sold-by-intellectus-partners-llc.html

14

https://themarketsdaily.com/2025/11/07/ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm-shares-purchased-by-raelipskie-partnership.html

15

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1978172850025398483

16

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1887180247331741752

17

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1886969649025151079

18

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1915839635969777712

19

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1534236746388492288

20

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1692321272535871823

21

https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239710/ishares-russell-2000-etf

22

https://www.fool.com/investing/stock-market/indexes/russell-2000/etfs/

23

https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239707/ishares-russell-1000-etf

24

https://www.ishares.com/us/products/239708/ishares-russell-1000-value-etf

25

https://money.usnews.com/investing/articles/best-russell-2000-etfs-to-buy-now

26

https://www.justetf.com/en/how-to/russell-2000-etfs.html

27

https://www.blackrock.com/us/individual/products/239710/ishares-russell-2000-etf

28

https://www.defenseworld.net/2025/11/11/ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm-shares-bought-by-allworth-financial-lp.html

29

https://www.themarketsdaily.com/2025/11/04/ishares-russell-2000-value-etf-iwn-is-cassaday-co-wealth-management-llcs-9th-largest-position.html

30

https://biztoc.com/x/c470fcbd558b882a

31

https://www.themarketsdaily.com/2025/11/04/ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm-shares-bought-by-mirae-asset-securities-usa-inc.html

32

https://www.dailypolitical.com/2025/11/06/ishares-russell-2000-growth-etf-iwo-shares-sold-by-commonwealth-equity-services-llc.html

33

https://www.defenseworld.net/2025/11/07/assetmark-inc-acquires-859-shares-of-ishares-russell-2000-value-etf-iwn.html

34

https://www.themarketsdaily.com/2025/11/04/simplex-trading-llc-buys-shares-of-192597-ishares-russell-2000-etf-iwm.html

35

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1978172850025398483

36

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1886969649025151079

37

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1887180247331741752

38

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1871329606806184020

39

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1534236746388492288

40

https://x.com/AggieCapitalist/status/1915839635969777712

Want to see @AggieCapitalist's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

4
Facts
0
Opinions
0
Emotive
0
Predictions