2%
Not Credible

Post by @cryptofergani

@cryptofergani
@cryptofergani
@cryptofergani

2% credible (2% factual, 1% presentation). The post's promise of a crypto giveaway aligns with documented scam tactics, lacking any substantiation or evidence of fulfillment. Omission framing and a bare assertion fallacy further undermine the claim's credibility, indicative of a fraudulent scheme.

2%
Factual claims accuracy
1%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post invites users to request amounts between $10 and $1,000, promising to 'bless' a few people with the money. This fits a common pattern of crypto giveaway scams on social media, where scammers lure victims with promises of free funds to extract personal information or cryptocurrency. The claim is highly likely to be fraudulent, lacking any verification or evidence of fulfillment.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
Make a request $10 - $1,000 I will bless a few ppl.

The Facts

The promise lacks substantiation and aligns with documented scam tactics in cryptocurrency promotions, where users are often tricked into sending funds first. Historical patterns from similar posts show no verified payouts, updating Bayesian priors (base rate ~5% for legitimate unsolicited giveaways) with low author truthfulness (25%) and bias toward engagement farming, yielding a posterior probability of legitimacy below 10%. Verdict: False and indicative of a scam.

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a self-promotional agenda to boost engagement and follower count on X, using the allure of quick financial gains to encourage interactions like replies or follows. It emphasizes easy money and exclusivity ('a few ppl') while omitting critical details such as payout methods, eligibility criteria, or proof of past giveaways, which shapes reader perception toward impulsive participation without scrutiny. Key insights: Omissions include no transparency on funding sources or scam warnings, and the repetitive nature ignores platform rules against paid engagement, fostering a deceptive sense of legitimacy.

Predictions Made

Claims about future events that can be verified later

Prediction 1
2%
Confidence

Make a request $10 - $1,000 I will bless a few ppl.

Prior: 5% (base rate for legitimate unsolicited crypto giveaways on social media, per training data and scam prevalence). Evidence: Author truthfulness 25% (low credibility), unverified status, bias toward engagement farming via repetitive promotions; web sources confirm similar scams (e.g., fake giveaways promising small to mid-range amounts like $10-$1,000 to build trust). No verification of past fulfillments. Posterior: 2% (strong negative update due to scam patterns and author track record).

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

criticalomission: missing context

The post omits any details on how the giveaway will be fulfilled, funding sources, eligibility, or proof of past payouts, presenting the promise as straightforward and legitimate.

Problematic phrases:

"I will bless a few ppl."

What's actually there:

No verified past giveaways; pattern of unsubstantiated promises

What's implied:

Reliable and immediate fulfillment

Impact: Misleads readers into impulsive participation by hiding scam risks and lack of credibility, fostering false trust.

highurgency: artificial urgency

Implies limited spots to create immediate action without any real time constraint.

Problematic phrases:

"a few ppl"

What's actually there:

No evidence of limited or time-bound selection

What's implied:

Exclusive and fleeting opportunity

Impact: Triggers fear of missing out, bypassing rational evaluation of the scam likelihood.

mediumscale: cherry picked scope

Presents a broad range of giveaway amounts without context on feasibility or selectivity, exaggerating the generosity.

Problematic phrases:

"$10 - $1,000"

What's actually there:

Historical unfulfilled promises; low credibility (25% truthfulness)

What's implied:

Realistic and substantial payouts to multiple users

Impact: Inflates perceived value and legitimacy, encouraging requests despite low probability of payout.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://dfpi.ca.gov/consumers/crypto/crypto-scam-tracker/

2

https://www.akamai.com/blog/security-research/crypto-giveaway-scams-are-still-successful

3

https://techforing.com/resources/articles/crypto-giveaway-scams

4

https://klever.io/blog/crypto-giveaway-scams/

5

https://www.coinbase.com/blog/crypto-giveaway-scams-and-how-to-spot-them

6

https://koinly.io/blog/crypto-giveaway-scams/

7

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56402378

8

https://koinly.io/blog/crypto-giveaway-scams/

9

https://www.yahoo.com/news/deepfakes-of-elon-musk-are-pushing-crypto-giveaway-scams-on-youtube-live-200700886.html

10

https://www.reuters.com/technology/fake-elon-musk-giveaway-featured-cryptocurrency-scams-us-ftc-2021-05-17/

11

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/fake-cryptocurrency-giveaway-sites-have-tripled-this-year/

12

https://malwaretips.com/blogs/biggest-crypto-giveaway-scam/

13

https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/tiktok-flooded-by-elon-musk-cryptocurrency-giveaway-scams/

14

https://malwaretips.com/blogs/elon-musk-x-crypto-giveaway-scam-what-you-need-to-know/

15

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1918215901016469826

16

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1936067382578905145

17

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1928187111645028440

18

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1916034302204129449

19

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1930652848192196681

20

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1932687132352495776

21

https://dfpi.ca.gov/consumers/crypto/crypto-scam-tracker/

22

https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56402378

23

https://moneysmart.gov.au/financial-scams/crypto-scams

24

https://www.coindesk.com/learn/5-social-media-crypto-scams-to-avoid

25

https://www.coinbase.com/blog/crypto-giveaway-scams-and-how-to-spot-them

26

https://www.osl.com/hk-en/academy/article/the-risks-of-social-media-crypto-giveaways-too-good-to-be-true

27

https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinBeginners/comments/1ioo8sc/whats_with_all_the_posts_on_x_claiming_to_give/

28

https://news.bitcoin.com/trumps-crypto-platform-hit-by-scammers-promising-15000-giveaways/

29

https://abc.net.au/news/2021-05-03/crypto-bitcoin-mining-scam-on-instagram/100016720

30

https://www.pcrisk.com/removal-guides/32080-x-crypto-giveaway-pop-up-scam

31

https://malwaretips.com/blogs/biggest-crypto-giveaway-scam/

32

https://www.ndss-symposium.org/ndss-paper/double-and-nothing-understanding-and-detecting-cryptocurrency-giveaway-scams/

33

https://weartv.com/news/local/okaloosa-county-residents-lose-11m-in-crypto-scam-via-social-media-messaging

34

https://www.coingabbar.com/en/crypto-blogs-details/elon-crypto-giveaway-campaigns-scam

35

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1918215901016469826

36

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1936067382578905145

37

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1916034302204129449

38

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1928187111645028440

39

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1929877761063018783

40

https://x.com/cryptofergani/status/1929184389004407095

Want to see @cryptofergani's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

0
Facts
0
Opinions
0
Emotive
1
Predictions