Post by @Shaughnessy119
86% credible (90% factual, 80% presentation). The invitation for pre-seed funding in crypto and AI startups aligns with the author's established investment track record, with no evident falsehoods. However, the presentation selectively frames the investment process as efficient and founder-friendly, omitting potential complexities and selectivity in scope.
Analysis Summary
The post serves as a direct call to pre-seed startups in the crypto and AI sectors to contact the author for potential funding, stressing efficient decision-making and personal involvement in diligence. It positions the investment approach as founder-friendly by using primarily own capital, avoiding traditional management fee structures. Main finding: This is a promotional solicitation aligned with the author's established role in early-stage crypto and AI investments, likely genuine but selective in scope.
Original Content
The Facts
The content is a straightforward personal invitation that matches the author's public track record of engaging with crypto and AI startups, with no evident falsehoods; Bayesian update from a prior base rate of ~80% for genuine VC solicitations, strengthened by 82% historical truthfulness and domain expertise, yields high confidence in authenticity. Verdict: Accurate
Benefit of the Doubt
The author advances an agenda of fostering innovation in crypto and AI by portraying themselves as an accessible, efficient investor who prioritizes startup success through personal capital and direct oversight, aiming to attract quality pitches amid a competitive funding landscape. Emphasis is placed on quick rejections, team diligence, and incentive alignment to build trust and differentiate from fee-driven VCs. Key insights about omissions: Lacks details on the fund's name, typical investment sizes, success rates, or specific criteria beyond 'fit,' potentially overstating accessibility; unreported perspectives include the high rejection rates in VC (often >99%) and risks of unverified investor claims in crypto spaces, shaping reader perception toward optimism without full cautionary context.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
The post selectively presents the investment process as efficient and founder-friendly while omitting key details like fund name, investment sizes, specific criteria, and historical success rates, which could alter perceptions of accessibility.
Problematic phrases:
"I won’t waste your time (direct no’s if not a fit)""We run primarily our own capital so we really care about success, not management fees"What's actually there:
VC rejection rates often exceed 99%; typical pre-seed deals require detailed pitches and have low success odds
What's implied:
Quick, low-barrier access to funding with personal care
Impact: Leads readers to underestimate barriers and risks, fostering undue optimism about securing funding in a highly competitive landscape.
Fails to mention common risks in crypto/AI investments, such as regulatory uncertainties, high failure rates of startups, or potential biases in diligence, presenting an overly positive view.
Problematic phrases:
"please get in touch""we really care about success"What's actually there:
Crypto sector faces regulatory scrutiny and >90% project failure rates; AI startups often struggle with scalability
What's implied:
Straightforward path to success-focused investment without highlighted pitfalls
Impact: Misleads aspiring founders into viewing the opportunity as low-risk and aligned, ignoring broader industry challenges that could temper expectations.
Portrays the investor as uniquely caring and efficient compared to traditional VCs, without acknowledging that many funds use personal capital or that fee structures vary, creating a biased differentiation.
Problematic phrases:
"not management fees"What's actually there:
Many angel investors and family offices operate similarly without fees; industry norms include diverse structures
What's implied:
This approach is exceptionally founder-friendly and rare
Impact: Shapes perception to favor this investor over others, potentially overlooking comparable options and encouraging selective outreach.
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.forbes.com/sites/torconstantino/2025/07/03/this-ai-startup-cracks-open-pre-ipo-investing-for-everyone/
https://arxiv.org/html/2507.08249v1
https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/global-funding-data-analysis-ai-eoy-2024/
https://www.theblock.co/post/331488/crypto-ai-startup-fraction-funding
https://www.theblock.co/post/326241/crypto-ai-startup-0g-labs-funding-token-commitment
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2024/10/30/ai-data-collection-startup-sapien-raises-105m-seed-funding-led-by-variant
https://www.coworkingcafe.com/blog/top-tech-startups/
https://www.theblock.co/post/331488/crypto-ai-startup-fraction-funding
https://www.theblock.co/post/311143/crypto-ai-sahara-labs-funding
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-11/startup-investors-are-betting-on-ai-and-leaving-crypto-behind
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/06/22/startup-kaito-gets-875m-valuation-in-new-funding-to-build-ai-search-engine-for-crypto
https://ainvest.com/news/ai-agents-startups-strategic-pathway-exponential-growth-bitcoin-crypto-ecosystem-2508
https://beincrypto.com/ai-startups-crypto-projects-funding-battle/
https://www.reuters.com/business/us-ai-startups-see-funding-surge-while-more-vc-funds-struggle-raise-data-shows-2025-07-15/
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1872811788263407771
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1888243971023106062
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1883724130450809021
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1763398361451815163
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1872071626520752482
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1777489984116703604
https://www.nasaa.org/75050/informed-investor-advisory-crypto-scams-investment-education-ai-bots/
https://www.securities.nd.gov/news/cryptocurrency-scams-involving-so-called-investment-education-foundations-and-ai-bots
https://cyber.fund/content/crypto-ai-investment-thesis-2025
https://skywork.ai/skypage/en/Analysis-of-the-American-AI-Startup-Valuation-Bubble:-Coexistence-of-Risks-and-Opportunities/1948644981300654080
https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/global-funding-data-analysis-ai-eoy-2024/
https://fortune.com/crypto/2025/04/25/paradigm-nous-research-crypto-ai-venture-capital-deepseek-openai-blockchain/
https://www.chainalysis.com/blog/scamdemic-ep-149/
https://www.theblock.co/post/311143/crypto-ai-sahara-labs-funding
https://www.theblock.co/post/331488/crypto-ai-startup-fraction-funding
https://www.coindesk.com/business/2023/06/22/startup-kaito-gets-875m-valuation-in-new-funding-to-build-ai-search-engine-for-crypto
https://www.coindesk.com/tech/2023/11/01/crypto-venture-funds-variant-1kx-lead-6m-funding-round-for-zk-meets-ai-startup-modulus/
https://www.ainvest.com/news/crypto-treasury-deals-reshape-startup-funding-landscape-2508/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2023-07-11/startup-investors-are-betting-on-ai-and-leaving-crypto-behind
https://news.crunchbase.com/venture/biggest-funding-rounds-ripple-metropolis/
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1872811788263407771
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1763398361451815163
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1777489984116703604
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1888243971023106062
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1872071626520752482
https://x.com/Shaughnessy119/status/1883724130450809021
Want to see @Shaughnessy119's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements