Post by @TrumpsHurricane
31% credible (35% factual, 21% presentation). The claim about a Harris-AOC 2028 ticket relies on unverified leaks from partisan sources, lacking confirmation from mainstream journalism. The presentation employs urgency framing with 'new leaks' and omits the speculative nature of the information, contributing to a low credibility score.
Analysis Summary
A social media post claims new leaks reveal Kamala Harris's plans for a 2028 presidential run with Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez as VP, aiming to solicit reactions. These claims stem from partisan, unverified sources like right-leaning outlets, with no credible confirmation from mainstream reporting. Counterarguments point to Harris's post-2024 challenges and AOC's independent ambitions, suggesting the rumor exaggerates Democratic infighting.
Original Content
The Facts
The claim relies on anonymous 'leaks' from biased sources without supporting evidence from reputable journalism, aligning with patterns of speculative political rumors on social media. Prior base rates for such unverified election leaks indicate low reliability (around 20-30% accuracy), updated by the author's 50% historical truthfulness and unverified status to a posterior probability of approximately 35%. Verdict: Largely unsubstantiated rumor
Benefit of the Doubt
The post advances a sensational, anti-Democratic agenda by presenting unconfirmed leaks as fact to portray the potential Harris-AOC ticket as radically left-wing and provoke outrage among conservative audiences. It emphasizes dramatic 'breaking' elements to drive engagement, while omitting critical context such as the leaks' origins in partisan blogs like Right Journalism and the absence of endorsements from Harris or AOC themselves. This selective framing shapes reader perception toward viewing Democrats as extreme and disorganized, ignoring broader discussions of Harris's 2024 fallout and AOC's separate 2028 explorations.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Labels unverified information as 'new' leaks to imply fresh, credible developments despite origins in older partisan speculation
Problematic phrases:
"New leaks"What's actually there:
Speculative rumors from partisan blogs without recent confirmation
What's implied:
Recently emerged credible intelligence
Impact: Creates illusion of timely breaking news, heightening perceived relevance and urgency for 2028 plans
Employs 'new leaks' phrasing to fabricate immediacy around hypothetical 2028 election strategies that are years away
Problematic phrases:
"New leaks indicate"What's actually there:
No imminent actions; post-2024 speculation only
What's implied:
Urgent, unfolding political plot
Impact: Prompts reactive emotional responses and speculation, overshadowing the claim's speculative nature
Fails to disclose the leaks' partisan, unverified origins and lack of mainstream corroboration, presenting rumor as factual
Problematic phrases:
"New leaks indicate Kamala Harris is planning to run... wants AOC as her VP"What's actually there:
No endorsements from Harris or AOC; stems from right-leaning outlets without evidence
What's implied:
Reliable indication of actual plans
Impact: Leads readers to infer Democratic disarray and extremism without counter-evidence like Harris's challenges or AOC's independent path
Portrays potential ticket as a sensational radical pairing without balanced views on Democratic dynamics
Problematic phrases:
"Kamala Harris is planning to run for president in 2028 and wants AOC as her VP"What's actually there:
Harris faces post-2024 hurdles; AOC has separate ambitions
What's implied:
Coordinated extreme left-wing alliance
Impact: Shapes perception toward viewing Democrats as disorganized and ideologically extreme, ignoring broader context
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-why-aoc-could-take-white-house-2028-kamala-harris-wont
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2028-election/kamala-harris-commentary-democrats-jump-starts-2028-presidential-conte-rcna233038
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2028_United_States_presidential_election
https://www.cnn.com/2025/09/19/politics/kamala-harris-2028-field-book
https://www.rightjournalism.com/breaking-new-leaks-indicate-kamala-harris-is-planning-to-run-for-president-in-2028-vp-pick-makes-walz-look-moderate/
https://www.the-independent.com/news/world/americas/us-politics/kamala-harris-2028-democratic-primary-b2719928.html
https://www.reddit.com/r/changemyview/comments/1nyapq0/cmv_kamala_harris_should_not_run_for_president_in/
https://www.rightjournalism.com/breaking-new-leaks-indicate-kamala-harris-is-planning-to-run-for-president-in-2028-vp-pick-makes-walz-look-moderate/
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kamala-harris-hints-possible-2028-run-says-some-call-her-most-qualified-candidate-ever
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kamala-harris-hints-possible-2028-151613128.html
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2028-election/kamala-harris-commentary-democrats-jump-starts-2028-presidential-conte-rcna233038
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/from-tell-all-end-all-former-vice-president-kamala-harris-5-big-career-mistakes
https://independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/aoc-presidential-race-2028-senate-b2829945.html
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-why-aoc-could-take-white-house-2028-kamala-harris-wont
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1962209601023070549
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1937647353080742327
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1974859832412017097
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1971267043296247885
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1828787052357541926
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1959975289477321029
https://www.politico.com/news/2024/11/25/kamala-harris-advisers-options-open-00191393
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/doug-schoen-why-aoc-could-take-white-house-2028-kamala-harris-wont
https://www.rightjournalism.com/breaking-new-leaks-indicate-kamala-harris-is-planning-to-run-for-president-in-2028-vp-pick-makes-walz-look-moderate/
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2028-election/kamala-harris-commentary-democrats-jump-starts-2028-presidential-conte-rcna233038
https://www.yahoo.com/news/alexandria-ocasio-cortez-close-second-175000091.html
https://today.yougov.com/politics/articles/52959-who-do-democrats-and-republicans-want-as-their-2028-presidential-nominees
https://www.cnn.com/2025/07/17/politics/2028-presidential-election-democrats-analysis
https://www.rightjournalism.com/breaking-new-leaks-indicate-kamala-harris-is-planning-to-run-for-president-in-2028-vp-pick-makes-walz-look-moderate/
https://www.foxnews.com/media/kamala-harris-hints-possible-2028-run-says-some-call-her-most-qualified-candidate-ever
https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/kamala-harris-hints-possible-2028-151613128.html
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/aoc-allegedly-eyeing-2028-run-dnc-vice-chair-rallies-party-needs-mamdani-ocasio-cortez
https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/video/mark-kelly-says-kamala-harris-would-be-incredibly-strong-in-a-2028-presidential-run-249725509883
https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/5513019-ocasio-cortez-political-future/
https://foxnews.com/politics/speculation-swirls-aoc-rumored-harbor-2028-aspirations-savvy-politician
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1962209601023070549
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1937647353080742327
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1974859832412017097
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1971267043296247885
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1828787052357541926
https://x.com/TrumpsHurricane/status/1959975289477321029
Want to see @TrumpsHurricane's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements