91%
Credible

Post by @suyaaa_nyaaan

@suyaaa_nyaaan
@suyaaa_nyaaan
@suyaaa_nyaaan

91% credible (95% factual, 83% presentation). The story of the 22-year-old university student's viral farewell post and the subsequent donations to the National Cancer Research Center is accurately reported and verified by multiple sources. However, the presentation quality is reduced due to omission framing that selectively highlights the positive aspects of the story while omitting other potentially relevant details.

95%
Factual claims accuracy
83%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

A 22-year-old university student diagnosed with rare cancer scheduled a humorous farewell post 'グエー死んだンゴ' on X before his passing, which went viral with over 200 million views and elicited community responses of '成仏してクレメンス'. The story is confirmed as true, inspiring widespread donations to the National Cancer Research Center as a form of condolence. This movement highlights positive aspects of Japanese internet culture, evoking emotional responses from users.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
普通の大学生だった男の子が希少がんで余命宣告を受けてXに遺言「グエー死んだンゴ」を予約投稿して息を引き取ったのちX民たちが「成仏してクレメンス」を送り日本国民以上の2億表示され更に国立がん研究センターに香典として寄付するムーブとても日本だしなかやまニキに届いてほしい…見てほしい涙

The Facts

The content accurately describes a real event involving a young cancer patient's viral post and the subsequent online community's supportive actions, corroborated by multiple news sources and social media trends. Verdict: True

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a perspective of admiration for compassionate online solidarity in the face of tragedy, framing the story as quintessentially 'Japanese' to evoke tears and hope that it reaches the deceased. Emphasis is placed on the viral scale, humor in the farewell, and charitable response, while omitting sensitive details like the student's full identity or family impact to respect privacy and maintain emotional focus. This selective presentation shapes reader perception toward uplifting internet positivity rather than the grief's rawness, potentially downplaying any exploitative aspects of virality.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

lowomission: missing context

Selective presentation focuses on uplifting viral response and donations while omitting details about the family's grief or potential downsides of public virality, such as privacy invasion.

Problematic phrases:

"日本国民以上の2億表示され更に国立がん研究センターに香典として寄付するムーブとても日本だし"

What's actually there:

Event confirmed true with privacy-respecting reporting in news sources

What's implied:

Purely positive community solidarity without complications

Impact: Misleads readers toward an overly idealized view of online compassion, downplaying the tragedy's raw emotional and ethical complexities.

lowscale: misleading comparison points

Compares views to 'more than Japanese population' to emphasize virality, but views can exceed population due to repeats and international reach, potentially exaggerating uniqueness.

Problematic phrases:

"日本国民以上の2億表示され"

What's actually there:

200M+ views confirmed viral but not uniquely per capita

What's implied:

Overwhelming national-scale engagement implying universal participation

Impact: Inflates perceived magnitude of solidarity, making the event seem more monumental than a standard viral phenomenon.

Want to see @suyaaa_nyaaan's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

6
Facts
1
Opinions
1
Emotive
0
Predictions