56%
Uncertain

Post by @MatJGeorge

@MatJGeorge
@MatJGeorge
@MatJGeorge

56% credible (60% factual, 45% presentation). The post accurately reports DA-era water tanker expenditure of R419 million but omits the total R777 million spent in the 2024/25 fiscal year under the new administration, engaging in cherry-picking and omission framing. While the factual claims are partially supported by financial records, the presentation lacks broader fiscal context and ongoing investigations, leading to a misleading narrative.

60%
Factual claims accuracy
45%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post claims that official financial records reveal the previous DA administration under Cilliers Brink spent R419 million on water tankers, R80 million more than the current administration's R342 million since October 2024, while leaving R179 million in unpaid invoices. This counters DA and News24 allegations of R777 million overspending under the new ANC-led coalition by highlighting inherited debts and doubled water outages due to DA-era infrastructure neglect. However, broader context from recent reports indicates ongoing debates, with DA launching probes into total spending exceeding budgets amid rising water losses.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
BREAKING: Official Tshwane Financial Records Reveal DA Spent R80 Million More on Water Tankers and Left R179 million in Unpaid Invoices After the DA and News24 rushed to falsely claim that R777 million was spent by the new administration on water tankers, official records now debunk this and expose that the new hard working government actually spent R80 million less than the DA administration. The records also reveal that Brink’s administration left over R179 million in unpaid invoices, which the new administration was forced to settle on water tankers. Here are the verified facts that the DA wants to hide: Since 16 October 2024, under the current administration, total verified expenditure on water tankers stands at R342 million which is nearly R80 million less than what was spent under the DA. Under the DA, Cilliers Brink spent over R419 million in water-tanker expenditure. Of the R242 million adjustments budget approved in February this year for water tankers, R150 million was because the DA had already exhausted its tanker budget by the end of the first quarter of 2024/25 first quarter of 2024/25 first quarter of 2024/25. Between 2021/22 and 2022/23, under the DA there was 7800 water aoutages. Under Brink in in 2023/24 this DOUBLED to 14 998 and by time Nasiphi came in this was 23 746. What this represents is the complete collapse of investment in water infrastructure under successive DA administrations that the new Mayor and her team are working hard to fix. Let’s see if News24 will correct the record and give South Africans the truth or will they continue to aid and abet the DA’s misinformation campaign.

The Facts

The post presents partisan claims supported by selective financial data aligning with ActionSA narratives, but independent reports confirm high overall tanker spending (R777 million total for 2024/25) under the new administration exceeding budgets, with DA-era issues acknowledged yet not fully debunking the overspend allegations. Partially accurate but misleading due to omission of total fiscal context and ongoing investigations.

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a pro-current administration (ANC-led coalition with ActionSA elements) agenda by framing the DA as fiscally irresponsible and the new government as diligent reformers, emphasizing reduced direct spending and inherited debts to deflect blame. Key omissions include the aggregate R777 million expenditure under the new regime—far above prior years—and failure to address persistent water infrastructure crises or DA probes into unauthorized spending, which shapes perception as a defensive counter-narrative rather than balanced accountability. This selective presentation portrays the DA's claims as 'fake news' while bolstering the author's political allies, potentially misleading readers on the full scale of municipal financial mismanagement.

Predictions Made

Claims about future events that can be verified later

Prediction 1
30%
Confidence

Let’s see if News24 will correct the record and give South Africans the truth

Prior: 35% (predictions on media behavior uncertain). Evidence: Bias against News24. Posterior: 30%.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

highomission: missing context

Omits the total R777 million expenditure for the 2024/25 fiscal year under the new administration, which includes the inherited debts, leading readers to believe the new government spent far less overall.

Problematic phrases:

"R342 million which is nearly R80 million less than what was spent under the DA""debunk this and expose"

What's actually there:

R777 million total for 2024/25 including debts

What's implied:

New admin spent only R342 million total

Impact: Misleads readers into underestimating the scale of current spending and overattributing fiscal issues to the DA, altering perceptions of accountability.

mediumscale: cherry picked scope

Compares short-term new administration spending (since October 2024) to longer DA periods (e.g., full years), creating a misleading impression of efficiency without normalizing for time or total budget.

Problematic phrases:

"Since 16 October 2024, under the current administration, total verified expenditure... R342 million""Under the DA, Cilliers Brink spent over R419 million"

What's actually there:

Partial year vs multi-year comparison

What's implied:

Direct apples-to-apples savings

Impact: Distorts scope, making the new administration appear more frugal than a full fiscal comparison would show, influencing judgments on fiscal responsibility.

mediumcausal: false causation

Implies DA's infrastructure neglect directly caused doubled water outages without evidence linking specific underinvestment to the increase, attributing outcomes solely to prior administration.

Problematic phrases:

"the complete collapse of investment in water infrastructure under successive DA administrations that the new Mayor and her team are working hard to fix""this DOUBLED to 14 998"

What's actually there:

Outages increased, but causation from investment collapse unproven amid broader factors like climate or maintenance

What's implied:

Direct DA fault for all rises

Impact: Creates false cause-effect, biasing readers to blame DA exclusively and credit new team prematurely for fixes.

lowurgency: artificial urgency

Uses 'BREAKING' for financial records that likely predate the post, presenting ongoing political debates as sudden revelations to heighten attention.

Problematic phrases:

"BREAKING: Official Tshwane Financial Records Reveal"

What's actually there:

What's implied:

Impact: Amplifies perceived novelty and importance, prompting quicker acceptance of the partisan narrative over deliberate verification.

criticalomission: unreported counter evidence

Fails to mention DA-initiated probes into new administration's unauthorized spending and exceeding budgets, despite high-level context confirming ongoing investigations into total overspend.

Problematic phrases:

"the DA wants to hide""Let’s see if News24 will correct the record"

What's actually there:

Investigations into R777m total and water losses

What's implied:

No such counter-claims or issues exist

Impact: Withholds evidence of mutual accountability, framing the post as definitive truth and opponents as purely deceptive, deeply skewing reader trust.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://pondolandtimes.co.za/actionsa-exposes-das-r777m-water-tanker-myth/

2

https://dagauteng.org.za/2025/10/da-launches-investigation-into-r777-million-tshwane-water-tanker-jackpot

3

https://www.citizen.co.za/news/tshwanes-r777m-water-tanker-scandal-sparks-fury/

4

https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/

5

https://iol.co.za/news/2025-10-21-mkp-plans-major-protest-over-tshwanes-r777-million-water-tanker-spending/

6

https://www.biznews.com/leadership/da-launches-investigation-tshwane-water-tankers

7

https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068

8

https://citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/local-news/fury-as-tshwane-blows-r777m-on-tankers

9

https://iol.co.za/news/2025-10-21-mkp-plans-major-protest-over-tshwanes-r777-million-water-tanker-spending/

10

https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068

11

https://newsday.co.za/south-africa/7855/r777-million-water-tanker-spend-sparks-tensions-in-tshwane-coalition/

12

https://www.biznews.com/leadership/da-launches-investigation-tshwane-water-tankers

13

https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/

14

https://www.citizen.co.za/news/tshwanes-r777m-water-tanker-scandal-sparks-fury/

15

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1836454497662501206

16

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1968360375868703150

17

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1968361932538396974

18

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1836708063300010191

19

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1895452956440576050

20

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1841420686033633471

21

https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068

22

https://www.biznews.com/interviews/2024/12/03/coalition-chaos-cilliers-brink-tshwane

23

https://www.biznews.com/interviews/2024/11/01/brink-actionsa-anc-eff-tshwane

24

https://www.biznews.com/leadership/da-launches-investigation-tshwane-water-tankers

25

https://www.businesslive.co.za/bd/national/2025-10-20-da-wants-answers-about-tshwanes-r700m-water-tanker-bill/

26

https://pondolandtimes.co.za/actionsa-exposes-das-r777m-water-tanker-myth/

27

https://newsday.co.za/south-africa/7855/r777-million-water-tanker-spend-sparks-tensions-in-tshwane-coalition/

28

https://citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/local-news/fury-as-tshwane-blows-r777m-on-tankers

29

https://iol.co.za/news/2025-10-21-mkp-plans-major-protest-over-tshwanes-r777-million-water-tanker-spending

30

https://news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068

31

https://biznews.com/leadership/da-launches-investigation-tshwane-water-tankers

32

https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe

33

https://citizen.co.za/news/tshwanes-r777m-water-tanker-scandal-sparks-fury

34

https://ewn.co.za/2025/10/21/soil-of-sa-urges-tshwane-to-invest-money-in-permanent-water-infrastructure-instead-of-tankers

35

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1836454497662501206

36

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1968360375868703150

37

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1968361932538396974

38

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1836708063300010191

39

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1895452956440576050

40

https://x.com/MatJGeorge/status/1841420686033633471

Want to see @MatJGeorge's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

12
Facts
2
Opinions
1
Emotive
1
Predictions