Post by @JordiGriff
81% credible (87% factual, 70% presentation). Tshwane's R777 million expenditure on water tankers for the 2024/2025 financial year is accurately reported, and Cape Town's zero spending on outsourced tankers aligns with its infrastructure strategy. However, the comparison omits critical contextual factors such as differing municipal challenges and budgets, resulting in biased framing.
Analysis Summary
The post highlights Tshwane's R777 million expenditure on water tankers in the 2024/2025 financial year, contrasting it with Cape Town's zero spending on outsourced tankers by prioritizing piped water infrastructure in townships. Tshwane's spend is verified as accurate, but the comparison omits broader contextual factors like differing municipal challenges and budgets. This raises questions about governance efficiency in ANC-led municipalities versus Cape Town's approach.
Original Content
The Facts
The core claim about Tshwane's R777 million spend is factually supported by recent reports, and Cape Town's zero outsourcing for tankers aligns with its infrastructure-focused strategy; however, the presentation selectively emphasizes contrasts without addressing variables like population size or water loss rates. Mostly Accurate with Biased Framing.
Benefit of the Doubt
The author advances an agenda critical of ANC-led coalitions in Tshwane, promoting ActionSA's narrative of better governance under previous DA-led administrations by contrasting wasteful spending with Cape Town's (DA-led) efficiency. Key omissions include Tshwane's infrastructure challenges, such as 39% water losses and informal settlements, which drive tanker reliance, and Cape Town's history of water crises that necessitated proactive piped investments. This selective presentation shapes perception toward viewing ANC municipalities as inherently mismanaged, potentially misleading readers on systemic issues like national water policy failures.
Visual Content Analysis
Images included in the original content
VISUAL DESCRIPTION
A vertical bar chart comparing outsourced water tanker spending (in R million) across six South African municipalities for the period July 2024 to June 2025. Bars are colored differently: Cape Town at 0 (blue), Nelson Mandela Bay at 30 (yellow), Johannesburg at 218 (yellow), eThekwini at 360 (yellow), Ekurhuleni at 637 (yellow with red segment for +455%), and Tshwane at 777 actual vs. 140 budgeted (red bar with yellow budgeted segment). Annotations explain Cape Town's approach (piped water in informal settlements, small emergency fleet) and note underreporting in other areas due to bundled chemical toilet provisions.
TEXT IN IMAGE
Outsourced water tanker spend: Why ANC municipalities should learn from Cape Town 01 July 2024 - 30 June 2025 Actual spend City ensures that communal stand pipes and piped water are available in informal settlements Small internal fleet of 14 tankers for emergencies Cape Town 0 Nelson Mandela Bay 30 Johannesburg 218 eThekwini 360 Ekurhuleni 637 Tshwane 777 Actual spend (R million) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 Municipality does not separate out provision of chemical toilets from water tankers Due to water challenges, this is likely underreported 687 637 +455% 360 218 30 140 Budgeted Budget Actual spend 777 Actual spend 687 637 +455% 360 218 30 140 Budgeted
MANIPULATION
No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; the chart appears professionally created with consistent styling and no visible alterations.
TEMPORAL ACCURACY
The chart explicitly covers the 2024/2025 financial year (July 2024 - June 2025), aligning with recent reports from October 2025, confirming it reflects up-to-date data.
LOCATION ACCURACY
The chart focuses on South African municipalities including Tshwane and Cape Town, directly matching the post's geographical claims about local governance.
FACT-CHECK
Data aligns with verified reports: Tshwane's R777m spend is confirmed by News24 and DA statements; Cape Town's zero is consistent with its piped infrastructure strategy and no reported outsourcing; other figures (e.g., Ekurhuleni 637m) match partial web data, though some underreporting is noted as plausible.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
The post contrasts spending without mentioning Tshwane's unique challenges like high water losses and informal settlements that require tankers, or Cape Town's proactive investments from past crises, leading readers to attribute differences solely to governance quality.
Problematic phrases:
"Cape Town spends zero on outsourced tankers. Zippo.""They ensure piped water is provided to townships."What's actually there:
Tshwane: 39% water losses, informal settlements drive tanker need; Cape Town: History of Day Zero crisis prompted infrastructure focus
What's implied:
Cape Town's success is purely due to better management, easily replicable in Tshwane
Impact: Readers perceive Tshwane as irrationally wasteful and Cape Town as a model of efficiency, ignoring structural differences and fostering unfair blame on ANC leadership.
Comparison of absolute spends (R777 mil vs zero) neglects scale differences like Tshwane's larger budget needs, population, or water infrastructure deficits, exaggerating the disparity.
Problematic phrases:
"astronomical R777 mil water tanker spend (R2mil a day)""zero on outsourced tankers"What's actually there:
Tshwane budget strained by 39% losses and informal areas; Cape Town invested post-2018 crisis
What's implied:
Tshwane's spend is extravagantly high relative to Cape Town's identical situation
Impact: Misleads on magnitude, making Tshwane's expenditure seem disproportionately wasteful without proportional context, amplifying perceptions of corruption or incompetence.
Presents Cape Town's approach positively without noting national water policy issues or Tshwane's coalition governance complexities, creating a binary good vs bad narrative.
Problematic phrases:
"How are they doing this?"What's actually there:
Author's ActionSA bias promotes DA-led Cape Town while criticizing ANC-led Tshwane; omits shared national challenges like aging infrastructure
What's implied:
Cape Town's method proves superiority of non-ANC governance
Impact: Shapes reader view toward partisan conclusions, viewing ANC municipalities as failed without considering multifaceted systemic failures.
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068
https://dagauteng.org.za/2025/10/da-launches-investigation-into-r777-million-tshwane-water-tanker-jackpot
https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cape_Town_water_crisis
https://www.ntotank.com/blog/cape-town-water-crisis
https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-03-01/tshwane-metro-faces-scrutiny-over-r242-million-increase-for-water-tankers-556484
https://www.citizen.co.za/news/tshwane-further-water-restrictions/
https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068
https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/
https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/tshwane-concerned-about-mushrooming-informal-settlements-spending-over-r360-million-on-water-tankers-and-toilets-7ce2fb18-abc8-4992-9b57-89f156e991a4
https://capetownetc.com/news/city-spends-over-r15-million-on-stolen-and-vandalised-water-infrastructure
https://timeslive.co.za/news/south-africa/2025-10-07-theft-vandalism-of-water-infrastructure-drains-cape-town-coffers
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/alleged-r4bn-irregularly-awarded-water-tanker-tender-controversy-hangs-over-tshwane-20231217
https://iol.co.za/news/2025-09-08-city-of-tshwane-faces-r1-3-billion-water-losses-amid-infrastructure-challenges/
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1965429751201628299
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1953700839907869132
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1961335905207165361
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1963586249261817926
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1948343300286530012
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1916825921576632676
https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068
https://dagauteng.org.za/2025/10/da-launches-investigation-into-r777-million-tshwane-water-tanker-jackpot
https://iol.co.za/news/2025-02-27-tshwanes-r777m-budget-adjustment-sparks-controversy-over-security-and-water-contracts/
https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/
https://www.ewn.co.za/2025/02/27/tshwane-da-questions-proposal-to-raise-metros-water-tanker-budget-by-over-r240m
https://www.iol.co.za/news/tshwanes-r777m-budget-adjustment-sparks-controversy-over-security-and-water-contracts-ff0b043a-c39f-46d4-b2a1-7897c849302c
https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2025-03-01/tshwane-metro-faces-scrutiny-over-r242-million-increase-for-water-tankers-556484
https://www.news24.com/investigations/tanking-finances-tshwanes-water-tanker-spend-spirals-to-r777m-under-anc-led-coalition-20251018-1068
https://centralnews.co.za/tshwane-eff-mmc-obakeng-responds-to-r777-million-water-tanker-overspend-awaits-full-finance-report-amid-da-probe/
https://iol.co.za/news/2025-07-06-city-of-tshwane-surpasses-revenue-target-collecting-r40-5-billion
https://citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/clear-sign-of-financial-discipline-tshwane-collects-r40-5bn-in-revenue
https://polity.org.za/article/cape-towns-water-directorate-adds-176-trucks-to-its-fleet-2025-08-12
https://citizen.co.za/news/south-africa/tshwane-makes-strides-in-corruption-fight-as-city-tackles-r13bn-irregular-expenditure-backlog
https://www.iol.co.za/news/politics/tshwanes-r7775-million-revenue-boost-coalition-parties-praise-citys-financial-turnaround-00937a52-862b-4850-ba17-64fce4283532
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1961335905207165361
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1965429751201628299
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1953700839907869132
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1916825921576632676
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1969985240375472533
https://x.com/JordiGriff/status/1929938899570180552
Want to see @JordiGriff's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements