98%
Credible

Post by @jameygannon

@jameygannon
@jameygannon
@jameygannon

98% credible (100% factual, 95% presentation). The content accurately reflects a widely circulated design industry meme, with no factual inaccuracies detected. Minor framing issues include omission bias in presenting client involvement solely as a cost-increasing factor, potentially skewing the narrative.

100%
Factual claims accuracy
95%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post shares a satirical price list image from a design firm, where costs escalate based on client involvement, captioned with the author's daily reflection on it. This highlights common frustrations in graphic design regarding client interference versus professional expertise. The image appears to be a genuine, widely circulated meme in design communities.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
i think about this once a day

The Facts

The content is a subjective personal reflection on a popular design industry meme, with the image matching known viral examples; no factual inaccuracies detected. Verdict: Authentic and truthful.

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a perspective valuing professional design autonomy, using humor to critique over-involved clients and promote the worth of expert services in graphic design. Emphasis is on the escalating prices as a witty deterrent, while omitting nuances like actual negotiation, project scopes, or ethical pricing debates in freelance work, which shapes perception toward seeing client input as a burden rather than collaboration. This selective framing resonates in creative niches but may overlook balanced client-designer partnerships.

Visual Content Analysis

Images included in the original content

A photograph of a storefront window displaying a handwritten blackboard-style price list for design services in euros, with prices increasing as client participation grows; the list is on a black background with white lettering inside a glass window; background includes a brick building, autumn trees, blurred pedestrians (including two men in dark clothing), a red car, and a small white toy mouse figure at the bottom right of the sign.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A photograph of a storefront window displaying a handwritten blackboard-style price list for design services in euros, with prices increasing as client participation grows; the list is on a black background with white lettering inside a glass window; background includes a brick building, autumn trees, blurred pedestrians (including two men in dark clothing), a red car, and a small white toy mouse figure at the bottom right of the sign.

TEXT IN IMAGE

PRICE LIST WE DESIGN EVERYTHING 500 EUR WE DESIGN, YOU WATCH 800 EUR WE DESIGN, YOU ADVISE 1000 EUR WE DESIGN, YOU HELP 1500 EUR YOU DESIGN, WE HELP 2000 EUR YOU DESIGN, WE ADVISE 3500 EUR YOU DESIGN, WE WATCH 5000 EUR YOU DESIGN EVERYTHING 8000 EUR

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; image appears to be a straightforward smartphone photo with natural lighting and reflections consistent with an outdoor urban setting.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

unknown

No explicit dates, timestamps, or seasonal indicators beyond possible autumn foliage; the meme style has circulated online since at least 2010s, suggesting it could be recent or archival without clear temporal clues.

LOCATION ACCURACY

unknown

No specific location claimed in the post; euro currency implies Europe, and urban street elements (brick buildings, awnings) are generic, matching typical European cityscapes but not verifiable to a exact place.

FACT-CHECK

The image depicts a real satirical sign often attributed to design agencies in Europe (e.g., similar versions traced to Berlin or Amsterdam firms via online searches); it accurately represents a common industry joke on client involvement, with no misleading elements—prices are fictional for humor, not literal quotes.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

lowomission: missing context

The satirical price list and caption frame client involvement solely as a cost-increasing interference, omitting contexts like beneficial feedback, standard project negotiations, or ethical pricing considerations in freelance design.

Problematic phrases:

"i think about this once a day"

What's actually there:

Client input can enhance outcomes in balanced partnerships

What's implied:

All client changes are detrimental and should be minimized

Impact: Misleads readers into overemphasizing client interference as a universal problem, potentially discouraging collaborative practices in design.

lowomission: one sided presentation

Presents the meme's humorous critique without counterpoints, such as successful client-designer collaborations or industry standards for handling revisions.

Problematic phrases:

"i think about this once a day"

What's actually there:

Freelance work involves negotiated scopes with mutual benefits

What's implied:

Client autonomy undermines professional expertise entirely

Impact: Shapes perception toward viewing clients as adversaries rather than partners, amplifying in-group solidarity among designers.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://www.reddit.com/r/DefendingAIArt/comments/1lidyt7/200k_likes_on_an_antiai_post_people_are_tired_of/

2

https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-023-00445-y

3

https://www.corralldesign.com/writing/ai-harm-hypocrisy

4

https://www.reddit.com/r/gamegrumps/comments/11hd1b8/twitter_thread_from_arin_on_ai_art_long_but_worth/

5

https://www.reddit.com/r/aiwars/comments/1gjsbxa/an_artist_on_twitter_made_this_critique_of_ai_i/

6

https://www.rasmussen.edu/degrees/design/blog/graphic-design-and-artificial-intelligence-what-designers-think/

7

https://craigboehman.com/blog/in-defense-of-ai-art

8

https://dotlung.com/blog/work-with-dot/13-questions-with-jamey-gannon/

9

https://theguardian.com/artanddesign/2025/sep/27/caravaggio-the-lute-player-badminton-ai-analysis

10

https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s44163-025-00343-4

11

https://academia.edu/128553788/The_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_on_Creativity_in_Graphic_Design

12

https://tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14626268.2025.2491471

13

https://elearningindustry.com/exploring-ai-generated-art-in-graphic-design

14

https://sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405844024160689

15

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1830991413590589683

16

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1948833156838113333

17

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1932899293314101747

18

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1884316711605682361

19

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1899853760215621884

20

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1883948539593867590

21

https://www.twine.net/blog/graphic-design-is-my-passion-memes-for-designers/

22

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/158963061824824018/

23

https://www.pinterest.com/pin/27866091433069525/

24

https://www.postud.io/blog/funny-designer-client-memes/

25

https://www.creativebloq.com/news/graphic-design-price-list

26

https://uk.pinterest.com/pin/27866091433069525/

27

https://kreafolk.com/blogs/inspirations/graphic-design-memes

28

https://www.boredpanda.com/designer-price-list-client-helps-digital-synopsis/

29

https://designwithred.com/funny-graphic-designer-memes-with-shitty-clients/

30

https://punsio.com/graphic-design-jokes

31

https://chameleonmemes.com/25-graphic-design-memes-every-designer-can-relate/

32

https://digitalsynopsis.com/design/graphic-design-memes/

33

https://kreafolk.com/blogs/inspirations/graphic-design-memes

34

https://pleated-jeans.com/2023/03/29/graphic-design-memes/

35

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1899853760215621884

36

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1761066927684776222

37

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1778919285844230182

38

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1960728423921222016

39

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1883948539593867590

40

https://x.com/jameygannon/status/1858563723448725916

Want to see @jameygannon's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

0
Facts
1
Opinions
0
Emotive
0
Predictions