3%
Not Credible

Post by @ISGofficial_

@ISGofficial_
@ISGofficial_
@ISGofficial_

3% credible (3% factual, 1% presentation). The claim that Pakistan Air Force jammed an Indian SIGINT aircraft, as evidenced by a FlightRadar24 snapshot, is unsupported and misleading; the image shows a routine flight path with an active transponder, typical for civil aviation monitoring. The post exhibits severe framing violations, including false causation and omission, alongside logical fallacies like post hoc ergo propter hoc, indicating propagandistic intent rather than factual reporting.

3%
Factual claims accuracy
1%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post asserts that Pakistan Air Force electronically jammed and intercepted an Indian Bombardier Global 5000 SIGINT/ELINT aircraft, forcing its transponder active and exposing the mission. However, the provided FlightRadar24 image shows only a routine flight path near Pakistani airspace with no visible evidence of jamming or interception. This appears to be a propagandistic claim lacking independent verification, aligning with the author's pattern of unsubstantiated military boasts.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
A FlightRadar24 snapshot reveals the Indian Bombardier Global 5000 (GB5002), modified for SIGINT/ELINT, being jammed and intercepted by the Pakistan Air Force. The PAF’s electronic countermeasures were so effective that the aircraft’s transponder (jammed navigation & communication as well) was forced active, exposing the mission for public to see. The incident highlights that no Indian plane is safe from Pakistan’s electronic warfare capabilities, as the plane was intercepted without completing its operation, demonstrating Pakistan’s control and readiness over its airspace.

The Facts

The claim is highly exaggerated and unsupported by evidence; the image depicts a standard tracked flight with an active transponder, which is normal for civil aviation monitoring and does not indicate jamming or forced activation. Verdict: False or misleading propaganda. Independent sources, including web reports on Indian Global 5000 aircraft (e.g., tail numbers GB8001/GB8002 used for ISR), confirm their existence but provide no corroboration of this specific incident, while opposing views from Indian media emphasize routine operations without interference.

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a pro-Pakistan nationalist agenda by portraying the Pakistan Air Force as technologically superior and dominant in regional airspace, using sensational language to glorify military capabilities against India. Key omissions include the lack of any technical proof of jamming (e.g., no radar logs, official statements, or third-party confirmations) and the normalcy of transponder activity on FlightRadar24, which tracks public ADS-B signals rather than secret missions. This selective framing shapes perception by implying espionage exposure while ignoring that such aircraft often fly civilian routes, potentially misleading readers into believing in unverified victories and escalating tensions without context from neutral observers like aviation authorities.

Visual Content Analysis

Images included in the original content

A screenshot from FlightRadar24 showing a world map centered on the Arabian Sea region, with a purple flight path tracing from Abu Dhabi (UAE) towards India, passing near the coast of Pakistan (close to Karachi). An aircraft icon labeled 'Bombardier Global 5000' with registration 'REG GB8002' and affiliation 'India - Air Force' is positioned over the sea. Inset panels display flight details including altitude (41,000 ft), ground speed (512 kts), and a small photo of a white Bombardier jet. The map includes country borders for Pakistan, Oman, UAE, and India.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A screenshot from FlightRadar24 showing a world map centered on the Arabian Sea region, with a purple flight path tracing from Abu Dhabi (UAE) towards India, passing near the coast of Pakistan (close to Karachi). An aircraft icon labeled 'Bombardier Global 5000' with registration 'REG GB8002' and affiliation 'India - Air Force' is positioned over the sea. Inset panels display flight details including altitude (41,000 ft), ground speed (512 kts), and a small photo of a white Bombardier jet. The map includes country borders for Pakistan, Oman, UAE, and India.

TEXT IN IMAGE

IFC137 IFC137 GLST; India - Air Force; N/A; NOT AVAILABLE; Departed N/A ago; NOT AVAILABLE; Bombardier Global 5000; Arriving in N/A; REG GB8002; BAROMETRIC ALT. 41,000 ft; GROUND SPEED 512 kts; IFC137 IFC137 GLST; India - Air Force; N/A; NOT AVAILABLE; Departed N/A ago; NOT AVAILABLE; Bombardier Global 5000; Arriving in N/A; REG GB8002; (c) George Chaldaris; Map labels: Pakistan, UAE, Oman, Arabian Sea, Karachi, Hyderabad, Muscat, Dubai, Salalah.

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No signs of editing, such as inconsistent lighting, artifacts, or mismatched elements; the screenshot appears authentic to FlightRadar24's standard interface with consistent fonts, colors, and map styling.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

current

The image lacks explicit timestamps but aligns with recent web reports (e.g., 2025 articles on Indian Global 5000 operations) and the post's context from October 2025; no outdated clues like old map versions or historical events.

LOCATION ACCURACY

matches_claim

The flight path shown skirts Pakistani airspace near Karachi in the Arabian Sea, consistent with the claim of proximity to Pakistan for potential interception; geographical features like Oman, UAE, and India borders are accurately rendered.

FACT-CHECK

The image factually shows a Bombardier Global 5000 (reg GB8002, Indian Air Force) on a flight from UAE to India, as corroborated by public aviation trackers and reports on India's ARC-operated ISR aircraft. However, it does not depict jamming or interception—active transponder is standard for visibility on FlightRadar24 via ADS-B; no evidence of disruption, and the registration mismatch (post claims GB5002) suggests possible error or fabrication in the narrative.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

highcausal: false causation

Implies jamming directly caused transponder activation and mission exposure, but transponders are routinely active on FlightRadar24 for tracked flights.

Problematic phrases:

"The PAF’s electronic countermeasures were so effective that the aircraft’s transponder... was forced active"

What's actually there:

Normal civilian transponder activity

What's implied:

Forced activation due to jamming

Impact: Leads readers to believe in a successful interception rather than a standard flight path, inflating perceived threat and success.

criticalomission: missing context

Omits that the image shows a routine flight near airspace with no signs of jamming or interception, ignoring normal aviation practices.

Problematic phrases:

"exposing the mission for public to see"

What's actually there:

Standard ISR aircraft on civilian-monitored route

What's implied:

Secret mission exposed by force

Impact: Misleads readers into viewing a benign flight as espionage failure, promoting unverified superiority without balanced context.

highomission: unreported counter evidence

Fails to mention lack of independent verification, official statements, or aviation authority confirmations contradicting the claim.

Problematic phrases:

"the incident highlights that no Indian plane is safe"

What's actually there:

No corroboration of incident

What's implied:

Verified Pakistani dominance

Impact: Readers perceive the event as factual proof of control, escalating tensions by ignoring absence of evidence from neutral sources.

mediumscale: cherry picked facts

Cherry-picks one flight snapshot to imply general airspace control, neglecting broader context of routine operations.

Problematic phrases:

"demonstrating Pakistan’s control and readiness over its airspace"

What's actually there:

Isolated routine flight

What's implied:

Systemic interception capability

Impact: Exaggerates the incident's scope, leading readers to overestimate Pakistan's capabilities based on a single, unverified example.

mediumurgency: artificial urgency

Presents a standard snapshot as a breaking exposure of a secret mission, creating false immediacy.

Problematic phrases:

"being jammed and intercepted""exposing the mission for public to see"

What's actually there:

Publicly available routine data

What's implied:

Urgent revelation of covert op

Impact: Instills a sense of immediate threat and victory, prompting quick emotional reactions over deliberate verification.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://zohaibauthor.com/2025/08/18/from-koral-to-hava-soj/

2

https://quwa.org/pakistan-air-force-news/pakistan-to-convert-a-bombardier-jet-into-an-electronic-warfare-aircraft/

3

https://defensehere.com/en/pakistan-inducts-global-6000-with-turkish-electronic-warfare-system/

4

https://forceindia.net/civilaviation/businessjets/more-than-special/

5

https://www.defensenews.com/air/2017/07/27/india-looks-for-intelligence-gathering-aircraft/

6

https://defensegda.com/iai-elta-eli-3150/

7

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/05/09/fighter-jets-india-pakistan-attack/

8

https://abingdonboy.tumblr.com/post/97400493726/bombardier-global-5000-fitted-with-elint-and

9

https://defensegda.com/iai-elta-eli-3150/

10

https://defencesecurityasia.com/en/india-captures-j-10c-and-pl-15e-electronic-digital-signatures-in-major-elint-win-against-pakistan/

11

https://idrw.org/pakistan-air-force-reconsiders-global-6000-conversion-to-havasoj-amid-threat-from-indian-s-400s-40n6-missiles

12

https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/defence/india-pakistan-air-battle-during-op-sindoor-what-is-an-elint-aewc-aircraft-and-why-the-iafs-kill-is-important/articleshow/123202417.cms

13

https://thekhybermail.com/paf-inducts-bombardier-global-6000-advanced-electronic-warfare-jet-extends-strategic-reach-beyond-500km

14

https://zohaibauthor.com/2025/08/18/from-koral-to-hava-soj/

15

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1957776847695147127

16

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1955219291118203164

17

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1963807319973618036

18

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1961323446605910238

19

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1955294131640557654

20

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1975464259266982007

21

https://zohaibauthor.com/2025/08/18/from-koral-to-hava-soj/

22

https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/5/14/did-pakistan-shoot-down-five-indian-fighter-jets-what-we-know

23

https://www.reuters.com/world/pakistans-chinese-made-jet-brought-down-two-indian-fighter-aircraft-us-officials-2025-05-08/

24

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/05/09/fighter-jets-india-pakistan-attack/

25

https://quwa.org/pakistan-air-force-news/pakistan-to-convert-a-bombardier-jet-into-an-electronic-warfare-aircraft/

26

https://www.reuters.com/fact-check/2024-indian-jet-crash-image-falsely-shared-pakistan-downed-indian-jet-may-2025-2025-05-13/

27

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/07/world/asia/india-pakistan-downed-aircraft.html

28

https://www.thekhybermail.com/paf-inducts-bombardier-global-6000-advanced-electronic-warfare-jet-extends-strategic-reach-beyond-500km/

29

https://idrw.org/pakistan-air-force-reconsiders-global-6000-conversion-to-havasoj-amid-threat-from-indian-s-400s-40n6-missiles

30

https://defensetalks.com/networks-over-numbers-the-2025-pakistan-india-air-war

31

https://bulgarianmilitary.com/2025/05/04/pakistans-j-10c-stuns-indias-rafale-with-electronic-jamming/

32

https://www.eurasiantimes.com/pakistan-turkey-team-up-against-india-ankara/

33

https://quwa.org/pakistan-air-force-news/pakistan-to-convert-a-bombardier-jet-into-an-electronic-warfare-aircraft/

34

https://www.pakdefense.com/blog/pakistan-air-force/beloved-peace-loving-sacred-country-pakistan-cuts-defense-deal-with-turkish-aerospace-industries-for-the-conversion-of-bombardier-global-6000-jet-to-dedicated-airborne-stand-off-jamming-aircraft/

35

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1957776847695147127

36

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1955219291118203164

37

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1978423212078703077

38

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1961323446605910238

39

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1979251890606215574

40

https://x.com/ISGofficial_/status/1978555094170796515

Want to see @ISGofficial_'s track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

3
Facts
2
Opinions
0
Emotive
0
Predictions