86%

Credible

Post by @G_S_Bhogal

86% credible (90% factual, 79% presentation). The claim that 'It’s not just X, it’s Y' is a common sign of chatbot writing aligns with documented patterns in AI writing analysis, though it's not universally exclusive to AI. The presentation quality is reduced by omission framing, as it does not mention that humans can also use this phrase and that not all AI text employs it.

90%

Factual claims accuracy

•

79%

Presentation quality

View Original X Post

Analysis Summary

The tweet highlights a specific phrase structure as a frequent indicator of AI-generated content, providing an example to illustrate its use in chatbot writing. The expression 'It’s not just X, it’s Y' is identified as one of the most common signs of chatbot authorship. It invites responses to share additional examples, fostering discussion on AI detection patterns. Opposing views note that while this phrase is overused in AI outputs, it can occasionally appear in human writing, and not all AI text employs it; omissions include the variability of AI styles across models and the need for contextual analysis beyond single phrases.

Original Content

Factual

Emotive

Opinion

Prediction

One of the most common signs that something has been written by chatbots is the expression “It’s not just X, it’s Y”. E.g. “It’s not just about helping others, it’s about growing as a person.” What are some others?

The Facts

The claim aligns with documented patterns in AI writing analysis from sources like OpenAI forums and Medium articles, where this phrase structure is frequently cited as a hallmark of models like ChatGPT. Author expertise in misinformation and human behavior supports the observation, though it's not universally exclusive to AI. Verdict: Mostly Accurate

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a perspective of heightened awareness about AI infiltration in online content, emphasizing detectable linguistic tics to empower readers in distinguishing human from machine writing. This selective focus on one phrase promotes skepticism toward formulaic language, shaping perception by portraying AI as predictably repetitive. Key omissions include the evolution of AI models reducing such patterns and the potential for human writers to mimic them intentionally, which could lead to overgeneralization in detection efforts.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

lowomission: missing context

The content presents the phrase as a key AI indicator without noting that humans also use it or that AI models vary in style, leading to potential over-detection of AI content.

Problematic phrases:

"One of the most common signs"

What's actually there:

Phrase appears in both human and AI writing, not exclusive

What's implied:

Strongly indicative of AI authorship

Impact: Readers may dismiss human-written content as AI-generated based on a non-exclusive marker, fostering unnecessary skepticism.

lowomission: unreported counter evidence

Omits evidence that evolving AI models reduce such repetitive patterns and that the phrase is not universally present in AI outputs.

Problematic phrases:

"It’s not just X, it’s Y"

What's actually there:

AI styles vary; phrase not always used

What's implied:

Common and reliable AI marker

Impact: Exaggerates the detectability of AI, leading to overconfidence in simplistic detection methods.

lowsequence: false pattern

Presents a single phrase structure as emblematic of a broader 'common' pattern in AI writing without substantiating frequency across diverse AI outputs.

Problematic phrases:

"One of the most common signs"

What's actually there:

Observed in some AI but not a universal trend

What's implied:

Representative of widespread AI linguistic habits

Impact: Creates illusion of predictable AI patterns, encouraging pattern-seeking behavior that may misidentify human text.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

https://medium.com/learning-data/words-and-phrases-that-make-it-obvious-you-used-chatgpt-2ba374033ac6

→

https://medium.com/@jordan_gibbs/spot-the-bot-why-chatgpts-style-is-so-obvious-e27c6afe1595

→

https://www.quora.com/Is-it-just-me-or-do-AI-chatbots-and-such-seem-to-have-a-distinctive-speech-pattern-writing-style-typing-style-I-cant-identify-What-is-different-but-AI-seems-to-talk-different-than-a-person

→

https://www.chatbot.com/blog/chatbot-terminology/

→

https://www.istitutomarangoni.com/en/maze35/community/the-5-overused-chatgpt-words-that-scream-ai-wrote-me

→

https://community.openai.com/t/avoiding-common-chatgpt-writing-styles-and-structures/624869

→

https://slate.com/technology/2025/08/chatgpt-artificial-intelligence-shaming-paranoia-writing.html

→

https://x.com/G_S_Bhogal/status/1605747739270164480

→

https://x.com/G_S_Bhogal/status/1670919480141139978