24%
Not Credible

Post by @DVanLangenhove

@DVanLangenhove
@DVanLangenhove
@DVanLangenhove

24% credible (29% factual, 13% presentation). The claim of PVV's victory in the 2025 Dutch elections is demonstrably false, contradicted by multiple reputable sources confirming D66's win. The post exhibits severe framing violations, including false urgency and omission of actual results, reflecting the author's nationalist bias.

29%
Factual claims accuracy
13%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post claims that Geert Wilders' PVV has won the Dutch election with 99.6% of votes counted, defeating D66. However, credible news sources including Reuters, The Guardian, and The New York Times report that the centrist D66 party secured the most seats, while PVV lost support and finished second. Main finding: The claim is demonstrably false, reflecting the author's nationalist bias rather than factual reporting.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
BREAKING: With 99,6% of the votes counted, Geert Wilders' nationalist PVV regains its lead and becomes the biggest party in the Netherlands, defeating the liberal D66 party.

The Facts

The claim contradicts multiple verified election results from reputable outlets, which confirm D66's victory and PVV's decline; the author's history of misinformation further undermines its reliability. Verdict: False

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances a far-right nationalist agenda by portraying PVV's success to bolster anti-immigration sentiments and morale among supporters, framing the election as a defeat for liberals. It emphasizes an alleged 'regain' of lead without evidence, selectively presenting unverified data to shape perceptions of populist triumph. Key insight: Omits the actual D66 win, PVV's seat losses from 2023, and broader context of mainstream parties ruling out coalitions with Wilders, which distorts the knife-edge reality into a fabricated victory narrative.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

highurgency: artificial urgency

Using 'BREAKING' to create false immediacy around a fabricated election outcome, prompting quick emotional reactions without verification.

Problematic phrases:

"BREAKING:"

What's actually there:

D66 won most seats, PVV second per Reuters, Guardian, NYT

What's implied:

Immediate PVV victory announcement

Impact: Leads readers to perceive an urgent, real-time nationalist triumph, bypassing critical thinking and spreading misinformation rapidly.

criticalomission: missing context

Selectively presents false vote count and outcome while omitting actual results, PVV's seat losses, and coalition exclusions, distorting the election into a PVV win.

Problematic phrases:

"With 99,6% of the votes counted""regains its lead and becomes the biggest party""defeating the liberal D66 party"

What's actually there:

D66 secured most seats, PVV finished second and lost support from 2023

What's implied:

PVV is the largest party with near-final count

Impact: Misleads readers about political reality, fostering false hope and reinforcing biased narratives of populist success over liberals.

highomission: unreported counter evidence

Ignores verified reports from reputable sources confirming D66's victory, presenting unverified false data as fact.

Problematic phrases:

"Geert Wilders' nationalist PVV regains its lead"

What's actually there:

PVV declined in support, no regain of lead

What's implied:

PVV successfully regained and leads

Impact: Prevents readers from encountering counter-evidence, solidifying a distorted view of election dynamics and anti-immigration momentum.

highscale: cherry picked facts

Cherry-picks a precise but fabricated vote percentage to imply authoritative, near-complete results favoring PVV, neglecting actual seat distribution.

Problematic phrases:

"With 99,6% of the votes counted"

What's actually there:

D66 most seats, PVV second; no 99.6% PVV lead

What's implied:

99.6% confirms PVV as biggest

Impact: Exaggerates the scale of PVV's supposed success, making the false claim appear statistically robust and convincing.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-vote-elections-test-european-populisms-reach-2025-10-29/

2

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/30/geert-wilders-faces-shutout-centrists-dutch-election-netherlands

3

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/oct/29/netherlands-parliamentary-election-geert-wilders-europe-latest-news-updates

4

https://time.com/7328870/netherlands-election-2025-geert-wilders-far-right-pvv/

5

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/oct/27/geert-wilders-far-right-netherlands-dutch-politics-election

6

https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/29/world/europe/netherlands-elections-geert-wilders.html

7

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-10-31/dutch-election-results-d66-pvv/105955042

8

https://www.politico.eu/article/rob-jetten-geert-wilders-centrist-d66-wins-dutch-election/

9

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/31/europe/dutch-centrist-d66-party-election-wins-intl

10

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/29/europe/dutch-election-poll-d66-party-latam-intl

11

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpwvy4w875vo

12

https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-vote-elections-test-european-populisms-reach-2025-10-29/

13

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/30/netherlands-election-results-geert-wilders-rob-jetten/

14

https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-elections-2025-rob-jetten-d66-big-surprise-who-are-they/

15

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1906705374058619142

16

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1800100219167846878

17

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1274418770589728769

18

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1800964497890275496

19

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1983815171647635621

20

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1983840132810620935

21

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/oct/29/netherlands-parliamentary-election-geert-wilders-europe-latest-news-updates

22

https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-vote-elections-test-european-populisms-reach-2025-10-29/

23

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/oct/30/geert-wilders-faces-shutout-centrists-dutch-election-netherlands

24

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/30/netherlands-election-results-geert-wilders-rob-jetten/

25

https://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2025/oct/30/dutch-election-results-netherlands-geert-wilders-rob-jetten-france-louvre-russia-poland-ukraine-latest-news-updates

26

https://www.politico.eu/article/dutch-election-2025-winners-losers-rob-jetten-geert-wilders-frans-timmermans/

27

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpwvy4w875vo

28

https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/2025/10/30/netherlands-election-results-geert-wilders-rob-jetten/

29

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cpwvy4w875vo

30

https://www.reuters.com/world/dutch-vote-elections-test-european-populisms-reach-2025-10-29/

31

https://www.cnn.com/2025/10/29/europe/dutch-election-poll-d66-party-latam-intl

32

https://nltimes.nl/2025/10/30/latest-exit-pol-d66-pvv-equal-footing-26-seats-977-votes-counted

33

https://www.dutchnews.nl/2025/10/d66-and-pvv-are-now-neck-and-neck-with-most-votes-counted/

34

https://nltimes.nl/2025/10/29/d66-leader-rob-jetten-celebrates-unity-optimism-election-win-means-become-dutch-pm

35

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1906705374058619142

36

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1131817530283237376

37

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1274418770589728769

38

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1205562521559715840

39

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1983815171647635621

40

https://x.com/DVanLangenhove/status/1983839493510582573

Want to see @DVanLangenhove's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

4
Facts
0
Opinions
0
Emotive
0
Predictions