0% credible. The claim that Standard Chartered recommended selling Bitcoin due to a quantum SHA-256 crack is entirely fabricated; no such statement exists, and the bank has recently been bullish on Bitcoin, predicting a rise to $135,000 or higher by year-end. The post employs urgency framing with 'BREAKING' and omits Standard Chartered's actual forecasts, constituting a deliberate spread of misinformation to promote precious metals investing.
The post claims Standard Chartered advises selling Bitcoin and buying gold and silver due to rumors of a quantum computer cracking SHA-256, but no such statement exists from the bank, which has recently been bullish on Bitcoin. Recent web searches confirm ongoing debunking of quantum threats to Bitcoin's cryptography and Standard Chartered's predictions of Bitcoin reaching $135,000 or higher by year-end. This appears to be fabricated FUD to promote precious metals investing.
The claim is entirely false and unsupported by any credible sources; Standard Chartered has not issued such advice and continues to recommend Bitcoin investments over gold in recent analyses. Quantum computer threats to SHA-256 remain speculative and unproven, with recent reports explicitly debunking similar rumors. Verdict: Fabricated misinformation.
The author advances an anti-Bitcoin agenda to promote gold and silver investments, framing the post as 'breaking news' to incite panic selling among crypto holders. Key omissions include any source link, actual Standard Chartered reports showing Bitcoin optimism (e.g., targets up to $200K), and the debunked nature of quantum SHA-256 crack rumors, which shape perception toward viewing Bitcoin as vulnerable while ignoring the bank's pro-crypto stance. This selective presentation exploits FUD to drive narrative toward precious metals as safer alternatives, aligning with the author's historical bias.
Images included in the original content
A simple orange circular emblem featuring white 'BTC' text in a bold font, representing the Bitcoin logo.
BTC
No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; it is a standard, unaltered logo.
The image is a timeless logo with no date-specific elements.
No location depicted or claimed.
This is the official Bitcoin logo, accurately representing the cryptocurrency but irrelevant to verifying the claim.
A corporate logo with blue and green abstract shapes forming an angular design next to the text 'Standard Chartered' in gray and black fonts.
Standard Chartered
No editing artifacts or inconsistencies; matches the official branding.
The logo design is the current version used by Standard Chartered as of 2025.
No specific location shown or implied.
This is the authentic Standard Chartered bank logo, but its use here does not substantiate the claim, as no official statement from the bank supports it.
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Problematic phrases:
"BREAKING"What's actually there:
No recent or any such advisory issued; bank is pro-Bitcoin
What's implied:
Immediate, new development requiring action
Impact: Leads readers to perceive an urgent threat, inciting panic selling of Bitcoin without assessing facts.
Problematic phrases:
"STANDARD CHARTERED SAYS TO SELL BITCOIN"What's actually there:
Bank's recent reports predict Bitcoin growth and dismiss gold in favor of crypto
What's implied:
Bank recommends divesting from Bitcoin
Impact: Distorts perception of expert consensus, making Bitcoin seem vulnerable while hiding pro-crypto evidence.
Problematic phrases:
"ON CREDIBLE RUMORS"What's actually there:
Rumors are speculative and repeatedly debunked; no causation to bank advice
What's implied:
Credible event directly prompting sell-off
Impact: Creates false link between rumor and authority advice, misleading readers on the validity and immediacy of the threat.
Problematic phrases:
"CREDIBLE RUMORS A QUANTUM COMPUTER HAS CRACKED SHA-256"What's actually there:
No quantum computer has cracked SHA-256; threats remain theoretical per recent expert reports
What's implied:
Verified, recent breakthrough
Impact: Readers interpret rumor as factual without context, heightening unfounded fears about cryptocurrency security.
Problematic phrases:
"BREAKING"What's actually there:
Rumors date back years with no new developments
What's implied:
Fresh, ongoing event
Impact: Falsely conveys timeliness, making outdated fears seem like breaking developments to manipulate market sentiment.
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://sherwood.news/crypto/standard-chartered-bitcoins-dip-below-usd100-000-is-inevitable/
https://www.quora.com/Will-quantum-computers-solve-Bitcoin-cryptography-SHA-256-before-the-last-coin-is-mined
https://finbold.com/quantum-computers-could-crack-bitcoins-security-in-the-next-decade/
https://coinpedia.org/news/sell-gold-buy-bitcoin-standard-chartereds-head-says-rotation-may-return/
https://www.theblock.co/post/375715/standard-chartered-bitcoin-dip-below-100000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend
https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://bitget.com/news/detail/12560605026600
https://coinpedia.org/news/sell-gold-buy-bitcoin-standard-chartereds-head-says-rotation-may-return/
https://www.tradingview.com/news/the_block:f6b73b1b0094b:0-standard-chartered-says-bitcoin-s-dip-below-100-000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend/
https://bitbo.io/news/standard-chartered-bitcoin-200k/
https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/15/beware-of-a-self-fulfilling-sell-off-if-bitcoin-returns-to-90000-says-standard-chartered-.html
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-price-faces-inevitable-dip-190248977.html
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1869904308139094497
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1858325806985978250
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1971241291838357570
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1889031303174947276
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1975960880262029346
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1943736916681089042
https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://www.theblock.co/post/330108/heres-what-satoshi-said-to-do-if-quantum-computing-cracks-bitcoin
https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinDiscussion/comments/1hjqiew/what_if_quantum_computers_crack_sha256/
https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/quantum-computers-break-bitcoin-2030-chatgpt-grok-gemini-weighs-in/
https://www.tomshardware.com/news/quantum-computer-development-could-put-bitcoin-security-at-risk-by-the-2030s
https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/when-will-quantum-computing-crack-blockchain-security
https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/
https://bitget.com/news/detail/12560605026600
https://u.today/bitcoin-could-be-cracked-by-quantum-computers-in-2-3-years-analyst-alerts
https://quantumcanary.org/insights/bitcoin-mining-and-quantum-computing-vulnerabilities
https://mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-515282-20241211Link
https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/quantum-computers-break-bitcoin-2030-chatgpt-grok-gemini-weighs-in/
https://www.tradingview.com/news/the_block:f6b73b1b0094b:0-standard-chartered-says-bitcoin-s-dip-below-100-000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend/
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1869904308139094497
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1977752413160235461
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1971241291838357570
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1943736916681089042
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1975960880262029346
https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1976049387840090396
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements