0%
Not Credible

Post by @BankerWeimar

@BankerWeimar
@BankerWeimar
@BankerWeimar

0% credible. The claim that Standard Chartered recommended selling Bitcoin due to a quantum SHA-256 crack is entirely fabricated; no such statement exists, and the bank has recently been bullish on Bitcoin, predicting a rise to $135,000 or higher by year-end. The post employs urgency framing with 'BREAKING' and omits Standard Chartered's actual forecasts, constituting a deliberate spread of misinformation to promote precious metals investing.

0%
Factual claims accuracy
0%
Presentation quality

Analysis Summary

The post claims Standard Chartered advises selling Bitcoin and buying gold and silver due to rumors of a quantum computer cracking SHA-256, but no such statement exists from the bank, which has recently been bullish on Bitcoin. Recent web searches confirm ongoing debunking of quantum threats to Bitcoin's cryptography and Standard Chartered's predictions of Bitcoin reaching $135,000 or higher by year-end. This appears to be fabricated FUD to promote precious metals investing.

Original Content

Factual
Emotive
Opinion
Prediction
BREAKING STANDARD CHARTERED SAYS TO SELL BITCOIN AND BUY GOLD AND SILVER ON CREDIBLE RUMORS A QUANTUM COMPUTER HAS CRACKED SHA-256

The Facts

The claim is entirely false and unsupported by any credible sources; Standard Chartered has not issued such advice and continues to recommend Bitcoin investments over gold in recent analyses. Quantum computer threats to SHA-256 remain speculative and unproven, with recent reports explicitly debunking similar rumors. Verdict: Fabricated misinformation.

Benefit of the Doubt

The author advances an anti-Bitcoin agenda to promote gold and silver investments, framing the post as 'breaking news' to incite panic selling among crypto holders. Key omissions include any source link, actual Standard Chartered reports showing Bitcoin optimism (e.g., targets up to $200K), and the debunked nature of quantum SHA-256 crack rumors, which shape perception toward viewing Bitcoin as vulnerable while ignoring the bank's pro-crypto stance. This selective presentation exploits FUD to drive narrative toward precious metals as safer alternatives, aligning with the author's historical bias.

Visual Content Analysis

Images included in the original content

A simple orange circular emblem featuring white 'BTC' text in a bold font, representing the Bitcoin logo.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A simple orange circular emblem featuring white 'BTC' text in a bold font, representing the Bitcoin logo.

TEXT IN IMAGE

BTC

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; it is a standard, unaltered logo.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

unknown

The image is a timeless logo with no date-specific elements.

LOCATION ACCURACY

unknown

No location depicted or claimed.

FACT-CHECK

This is the official Bitcoin logo, accurately representing the cryptocurrency but irrelevant to verifying the claim.

A corporate logo with blue and green abstract shapes forming an angular design next to the text 'Standard Chartered' in gray and black fonts.

VISUAL DESCRIPTION

A corporate logo with blue and green abstract shapes forming an angular design next to the text 'Standard Chartered' in gray and black fonts.

TEXT IN IMAGE

Standard Chartered

MANIPULATION

Not Detected

No editing artifacts or inconsistencies; matches the official branding.

TEMPORAL ACCURACY

current

The logo design is the current version used by Standard Chartered as of 2025.

LOCATION ACCURACY

unknown

No specific location shown or implied.

FACT-CHECK

This is the authentic Standard Chartered bank logo, but its use here does not substantiate the claim, as no official statement from the bank supports it.

How Is This Framed?

Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected

highurgency: artificial urgency

Uses 'BREAKING' to fabricate a sense of immediate crisis, prompting hasty decisions without verification.

Problematic phrases:

"BREAKING"

What's actually there:

No recent or any such advisory issued; bank is pro-Bitcoin

What's implied:

Immediate, new development requiring action

Impact: Leads readers to perceive an urgent threat, inciting panic selling of Bitcoin without assessing facts.

criticalomission: unreported counter evidence

Omits Standard Chartered's actual bullish Bitcoin forecasts (e.g., $135K-$200K targets) and debunked quantum threats, presenting a one-sided anti-Bitcoin narrative.

Problematic phrases:

"STANDARD CHARTERED SAYS TO SELL BITCOIN"

What's actually there:

Bank's recent reports predict Bitcoin growth and dismiss gold in favor of crypto

What's implied:

Bank recommends divesting from Bitcoin

Impact: Distorts perception of expert consensus, making Bitcoin seem vulnerable while hiding pro-crypto evidence.

highcausal: false causation

Implies the bank's advice is directly caused by 'credible rumors' without evidence, linking unproven tech fears to financial recommendations.

Problematic phrases:

"ON CREDIBLE RUMORS"

What's actually there:

Rumors are speculative and repeatedly debunked; no causation to bank advice

What's implied:

Credible event directly prompting sell-off

Impact: Creates false link between rumor and authority advice, misleading readers on the validity and immediacy of the threat.

highomission: missing context

Fails to provide any source or context for the claim, omitting that quantum threats to SHA-256 are long-standing speculation, not new or credible.

Problematic phrases:

"CREDIBLE RUMORS A QUANTUM COMPUTER HAS CRACKED SHA-256"

What's actually there:

No quantum computer has cracked SHA-256; threats remain theoretical per recent expert reports

What's implied:

Verified, recent breakthrough

Impact: Readers interpret rumor as factual without context, heightening unfounded fears about cryptocurrency security.

mediumtemporal: recency deception

Presents fabricated 'breaking' news as current, while quantum cracking rumors are old and recycled misinformation.

Problematic phrases:

"BREAKING"

What's actually there:

Rumors date back years with no new developments

What's implied:

Fresh, ongoing event

Impact: Falsely conveys timeliness, making outdated fears seem like breaking developments to manipulate market sentiment.

Sources & References

External sources consulted for this analysis

1

https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

2

https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

3

https://sherwood.news/crypto/standard-chartered-bitcoins-dip-below-usd100-000-is-inevitable/

4

https://www.quora.com/Will-quantum-computers-solve-Bitcoin-cryptography-SHA-256-before-the-last-coin-is-mined

5

https://finbold.com/quantum-computers-could-crack-bitcoins-security-in-the-next-decade/

6

https://coinpedia.org/news/sell-gold-buy-bitcoin-standard-chartereds-head-says-rotation-may-return/

7

https://www.theblock.co/post/375715/standard-chartered-bitcoin-dip-below-100000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend

8

https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

9

https://bitget.com/news/detail/12560605026600

10

https://coinpedia.org/news/sell-gold-buy-bitcoin-standard-chartereds-head-says-rotation-may-return/

11

https://www.tradingview.com/news/the_block:f6b73b1b0094b:0-standard-chartered-says-bitcoin-s-dip-below-100-000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend/

12

https://bitbo.io/news/standard-chartered-bitcoin-200k/

13

https://www.cnbc.com/2025/01/15/beware-of-a-self-fulfilling-sell-off-if-bitcoin-returns-to-90000-says-standard-chartered-.html

14

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/bitcoin-price-faces-inevitable-dip-190248977.html

15

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1869904308139094497

16

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1858325806985978250

17

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1971241291838357570

18

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1889031303174947276

19

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1975960880262029346

20

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1943736916681089042

21

https://bitcoinethereumnews.com/bitcoin/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

22

https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

23

https://www.theblock.co/post/330108/heres-what-satoshi-said-to-do-if-quantum-computing-cracks-bitcoin

24

https://www.reddit.com/r/BitcoinDiscussion/comments/1hjqiew/what_if_quantum_computers_crack_sha256/

25

https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/quantum-computers-break-bitcoin-2030-chatgpt-grok-gemini-weighs-in/

26

https://www.tomshardware.com/news/quantum-computer-development-could-put-bitcoin-security-at-risk-by-the-2030s

27

https://coinmarketcap.com/academy/article/when-will-quantum-computing-crack-blockchain-security

28

https://protos.com/no-a-quantum-computer-didnt-break-sha-256-or-bitcoin/

29

https://bitget.com/news/detail/12560605026600

30

https://u.today/bitcoin-could-be-cracked-by-quantum-computers-in-2-3-years-analyst-alerts

31

https://quantumcanary.org/insights/bitcoin-mining-and-quantum-computing-vulnerabilities

32

https://mitrade.com/insights/news/live-news/article-3-515282-20241211Link

33

https://www.ccn.com/education/crypto/quantum-computers-break-bitcoin-2030-chatgpt-grok-gemini-weighs-in/

34

https://www.tradingview.com/news/the_block:f6b73b1b0094b:0-standard-chartered-says-bitcoin-s-dip-below-100-000-seems-inevitable-by-this-weekend/

35

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1869904308139094497

36

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1977752413160235461

37

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1971241291838357570

38

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1943736916681089042

39

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1975960880262029346

40

https://x.com/BankerWeimar/status/1976049387840090396

Want to see @BankerWeimar's track record?

View their credibility score and all analyzed statements

View Profile

Content Breakdown

2
Facts
0
Opinions
1
Emotive
0
Predictions