Post by @MorePerfectUS
81% credible (87% factual, 72% presentation). The post accurately reports OpenAI's use of pirated books and related legal risks, supported by credible sources and court filings. However, the presentation omits OpenAI's fair use defenses and complexities in proving willful infringement, introducing framing violations that impact overall credibility.
Analysis Summary
The post alleges that OpenAI used pirated books to train its AI models, deleted the dataset, and now faces potential lawsuits demanding up to $150,000 per book in damages, totaling billions. This claim aligns with ongoing copyright litigation where courts have ordered OpenAI to disclose internal communications about data deletion, increasing risks of willful infringement findings. However, final outcomes depend on pending legal proceedings and defenses like fair use.
Original Content
The Facts
The post accurately reflects reported facts from credible sources like Bloomberg and court filings on OpenAI's use of pirated datasets and internal deletions, though the 'could force' language highlights potential rather than guaranteed outcomes. Mostly Accurate, with strong evidentiary support but speculative on final damages.
Benefit of the Doubt
The author advances a perspective critical of Big Tech, emphasizing corporate misconduct in AI development to promote accountability and regulation. It highlights sensational elements like piracy and massive penalties to evoke outrage, while omitting OpenAI's fair use defenses, similar case settlements (e.g., Anthropic's $1.5B deal), and the uncertainty of proving willful infringement across millions of works, which shapes reader perception toward viewing OpenAI as inevitably liable without balanced context.
Predictions Made
Claims about future events that can be verified later
A lawsuit could now force the company to pay $150,000 per book
Prior: 55% from base rate of high damages in copyright cases against AI (e.g., Anthropic settlement precedent). Evidence: Author expertise in regulation + sources on potential enhanced damages for willful acts. Bias toward big penalties noted, but speculative outcome. Posterior: 75%.
adding up to billions in damages.
Prior: 50% base rate for massive awards in class actions (variable outcomes). Evidence: Credible author history + analyses in Bloomberg/Futurism on billion-dollar threats. Omission of fair use defenses and settlements tempers certainty. Posterior: 70%.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Omits OpenAI's fair use defenses, complexities in proving willful infringement, and examples of similar case settlements, presenting potential damages as more certain than they are.
Problematic phrases:
"A lawsuit could now force the company to pay $150,000 per book, adding up to billions in damages"What's actually there:
Pending litigation with fair use arguments and uncertain willful infringement proof
What's implied:
Inevitable massive penalties without defenses
Impact: Leads readers to overestimate liability likelihood and view OpenAI as guilty without balanced legal context, heightening anti-corporate sentiment.
Fails to mention alternative perspectives like Anthropic's $1.5B settlement or ongoing appeals, selectively focusing on punitive aspects.
Problematic phrases:
"OpenAI pirated large numbers of books""adding up to billions in damages"What's actually there:
Cases often settle or use fair use; e.g., Anthropic $1.5B deal
What's implied:
OpenAI uniquely and severely liable for billions
Impact: Distorts perception of AI industry norms, making OpenAI's situation seem exceptionally dire and isolated.
Emphasizes 'billions in damages' from $150,000 per book without specifying the number of books or success probability, inflating perceived magnitude.
Problematic phrases:
"large numbers of books""adding up to billions in damages"What's actually there:
Damages depend on proven infringements (potentially millions of works) and court rulings, not guaranteed
What's implied:
Definite and enormous financial ruin from all books
Impact: Readers infer catastrophic scale without considering variables like partial awards or defenses, exaggerating threat.
Uses 'could now force' to imply imminent consequences, despite litigation being multi-year and unresolved.
Problematic phrases:
"A lawsuit could now force"What's actually there:
What's implied:
Impact: Creates false sense of immediate crisis, prompting quicker emotional reactions over measured analysis.
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/05/authors-file-a-lawsuit-against-openai-for-unlawfully-ingesting-their-books
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/openai-danger-authors-internal-slack-messages
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-risks-billions-as-court-weighs-privilege-in-copyright-row
https://piracymonitor.org/chat-gpt-trained-using-pirated-e-books/
https://slate.com/technology/2025/06/ai-copyright-lawsuits-anthropic-meta-openai-google.html
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/meta-staff-torrented-nearly-82tb-of-pirated-books-for-ai-training-court-records-reveal-copyright-violations
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/daily-labor-report/openai-risks-billions-as-court-weighs-privilege-in-copyright-row
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/openai-danger-authors-internal-slack-messages
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/10/30/george-r-r-martins-copyright-lawsuit-against-openai-gains-traction-in-court/
https://www.webpronews.com/openai-ordered-to-disclose-slack-messages-in-pirated-books-copyright-case/
https://www.webpronews.com/neuroscientists-sue-apple-over-pirated-books-in-ai-training/
https://www.webpronews.com/authors-sue-salesforce-for-ai-copyright-infringement-on-pirated-books/
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-risks-billions-as-court-weighs-privilege-in-copyright-row
https://www.publishersweekly.com/pw/by-topic/digital/copyright/article/98961-authors-class-action-lawsuit-against-openai-moves-forward.html
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1965504302723858513
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1960743340934107414
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1969063104773263844
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1802760950539522450
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1618416332940398592
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1828181031289024795
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/openai-danger-authors-internal-slack-messages
https://www.businessinsider.com/openai-destroyed-ai-training-datasets-lawsuit-authors-books-copyright-2024-5
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/openai-sued-by-new-set-of-authors-over-training-data-copyrights
https://sustainabletechpartner.com/topics/ai/generative-ai-lawsuit-timeline/
https://piracymonitor.org/chat-gpt-trained-using-pirated-e-books/
https://www.tomshardware.com/tech-industry/artificial-intelligence/meta-staff-torrented-nearly-82tb-of-pirated-books-for-ai-training-court-records-reveal-copyright-violations
https://www.theguardian.com/books/2023/jul/05/authors-file-a-lawsuit-against-openai-for-unlawfully-ingesting-their-books
https://sustainabletechpartner.com/topics/ai/generative-ai-lawsuit-timeline/
https://www.breitbart.com/tech/2025/10/30/george-r-r-martins-copyright-lawsuit-against-openai-gains-traction-in-court/
https://futurism.com/artificial-intelligence/openai-danger-authors-internal-slack-messages
https://ainvest.com/news/piracy-suit-meta-tests-corporate-responsibility-ai-development-2510
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/technology/tech-news/apple-faces-lawsuit-over-ai-training-data-as-openai-microsoft-and-meta-battle-similar-claims/articleshow/124471726.cms
https://the-decoder.com/openai-could-face-a-billion-dollar-fine-over-claims-it-used-pirated-books-in-ai-training/
https://www.webpronews.com/authors-sue-salesforce-for-ai-copyright-infringement-on-pirated-books/
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1965504302723858513
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1960743340934107414
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1836151690031927663
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1969063104773263844
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1802760950539522450
https://x.com/MorePerfectUS/status/1865067632078057794
Want to see @moreperfectus's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements