Post by @TheKiffness
79% credible (85% factual, 70% presentation). The post accurately reports multiple South African media outlets issuing apologies to AfriForum following Press Council rulings on inaccuracies, though it frames these as intentional 'lying' without evidence of malice in all cases. The factual accuracy is high, but the presentation suffers from omission framing by not detailing the nature of the inaccuracies.
Analysis Summary
The post lists several South African media outlets that have issued apologies to AfriForum for what it claims is lying or inaccurate reporting. Multiple outlets, including News24, City Press, Sunday World, and others, have indeed published corrections and apologies following Press Council rulings on false claims about AfriForum. This reflects ongoing tensions between AfriForum and the media over coverage of issues like 'white genocide' narratives.
Original Content
The Facts
The post accurately highlights real instances of media apologies to AfriForum based on Press Ombudsman rulings for inaccuracies, though it frames them as intentional 'lying' without evidence of malice in all cases. Prior base rate for such media accountability claims is around 70% accurate given frequent journalistic corrections; updated with author's 85% historical truthfulness and verified status as positive evidence, tempered by pro-AfriForum bias as negative, yields high posterior confidence. Mostly Accurate
Benefit of the Doubt
The author advances a perspective of media bias against AfriForum, portraying outlets as untrustworthy activists who prioritize narratives over facts and only correct when caught. It emphasizes the volume of apologies to suggest systemic deceit, while omitting specifics of the inaccuracies (e.g., misrepresentations of AfriForum's 'white genocide' claims) and media defenses like editorial errors rather than deliberate lies. This selective framing shapes perception of a coordinated anti-AfriForum agenda, ignoring journalistic standards and AfriForum's own controversial positions that may provoke scrutiny.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Fails to provide details on the nature of inaccuracies (e.g., misrepresentations of AfriForum's claims) or media explanations like editorial errors, framing all as deliberate lies.
Problematic phrases:
"for lying""They LIE & apologise when caught"What's actually there:
Apologies for factual inaccuracies per Press Council rulings, often without proven intent
What's implied:
Intentional deceit by media against AfriForum
Impact: Readers perceive media as systematically malicious rather than fallible, amplifying distrust without balanced view of journalistic standards or AfriForum's role in disputes
Presents only AfriForum-favorable outcomes (apologies) while omitting counter-evidence like AfriForum's own fact-check failures or media's successful defenses in other cases.
Problematic phrases:
"Media outlets forced to apologise to @afriforum"What's actually there:
Ongoing multi-faceted tensions with mutual complaints
What's implied:
Unilateral media wrongdoing
Impact: Shapes view of coordinated anti-AfriForum bias, ignoring reciprocal scrutiny and broader context of South African media-AfriForum relations
Uses multipliers like 'x 3' and lists to imply a mounting or systemic pattern of deceit, treating separate rulings as interconnected trends.
Problematic phrases:
"@News24 / @City_Press x 3""@SundayWorldZA x 3""@IOL / @ewnupdates 3+"What's actually there:
Isolated Press Council cases over time
What's implied:
Wave of repeated lies by same outlets
Impact: Exaggerates prevalence, leading readers to infer ongoing conspiracy rather than sporadic errors
Implies apologies directly result from proven 'lying' (intentional falsehoods), without evidence linking rulings to malice versus negligence.
Problematic phrases:
"forced to apologise to @afriforum for lying"What's actually there:
Rulings for inaccuracies, not always intent
What's implied:
Apologies admit deliberate deception
Impact: Creates false cause-effect, portraying media as willfully dishonest rather than accountable for errors
Cherry-picks apologies to AfriForum, neglecting denominator of total media outputs or instances where AfriForum's claims were debunked.
Problematic phrases:
"@News24 / @City_Press x 3 - @SundayWorldZA x 3 - @IOL / @ewnupdates 3+"What's actually there:
Few apologies amid vast media volume; AfriForum has lost some complaints
What's implied:
High frequency of media lies against AfriForum
Impact: Inflates perceived scale of media bias, misleading on overall trustworthiness
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/correction-and-apology-to-afriforum-20251128-0794
https://presscouncil.org.za/2025/05/05/solidarity-and-afriforum-vs-daily-maverick/
https://presscouncil.org.za/2024/12/02/afriforum-vs-sunday-world/
https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/the-information-war-against-afriforum
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/opinionista/2025-11-24-afriforum-and-solidarity-when-civil-activism-crosses-the-line-of-sovereignty/
https://presscouncil.org.za/2021/01/21/afriforum-vs-timeslive/
https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2025-04-07-how-to-normalise-ethnic-cleansing-with-the-help-of-false-binaries-afriforum-and-anti-semites/
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/correction-and-apology-to-afriforum-20251128-0794
https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/controversial-cape-town-politician-apologises-to-afriforum-ceo-to-settle-harassment-case-20250404
https://artikels.afriforum.co.za/en/press-ombudsman-rules-in-afriforums-favour-and-orders-sunday-world-to-publish-apology-for-false-reporting
https://www.satorinews.com/articles/2024-11-20/press-ombudsman-rules-against-sunday-world-in-afriforum-misreporting-case-515973
https://groundup.org.za/article/ombud-finds-sunday-world-breached-press-code-in-afriforum-article/
https://sundayworld.co.za/news/apology-to-afriforum-and-solidarity/
https://sabcnews.com/sabcnews/afriforum-denies
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1838532434180055352
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1820794019255034125
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1957774856214192366
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1905931999803572702
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1958109865609662750
https://x.com/TheKiffness/status/1895097697155313913
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/correction-and-apology-to-afriforum-20251128-0794
https://www.politicsweb.co.za/opinion/the-information-war-against-afriforum
https://iol.co.za/news/politics/2025-02-03-anc-condemns-afriforums-misinformation-campaign-calls-for-rejection-of-racist-distortions/
https://sundayworld.co.za/news/apology-to-afriforum-and-solidarity/
https://beweging.co.za/the-anc-and-the-medias-missed-information-in-spurious-claims-against-the-solidarity-movement/
https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/afriforum-denies/
https://www.artikels.afriforum.co.za/en/press-ombudsman-rules-in-afriforums-favour-and-orders-sunday-world-to-publish-apology-for-false-reporting/
https://www.sabcnews.com/sabcnews/afriforum-denies/
https://www.news24.com/citypress/news/correction-and-apology-to-afriforum-20251128-0794
https://dirco.gov.za/south-africa-rejects-inaccurate-and-deeply-flawed-account-of-human-rights-practices
https://www.news24.com/news24/southafrica/news/apology-to-afriforum-for-no-solutions-claim-in-land-column-20181116
https://groundup.org.za/article/ombud-finds-sunday-world-breached-press-code-in-afriforum-article/
https://grokipedia.com/page/AfriForum
https://www.saipa.co.za/saipa-statement-on-allegations-by-afriforum-youth/
https://x.com/ewnupdates/status/1552930066031513600
https://x.com/News24/status/1247858497619984385
https://x.com/News24/status/1246898421899853824
https://x.com/TimesLIVE/status/1833536376341491893
https://x.com/TimesLIVE/status/1909962066166689870
https://x.com/TimesLIVE/status/1896086249544581616
Want to see @TheKiffness's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements