15% credible (20% factual, 10% presentation). The post relies on a manipulated image of non-existent tweets from Elon Musk, promoting an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory about Trump and the Epstein files. Significant framing violations include omission of verification for the screenshot's authenticity and logical fallacies such as appeal to false authority.
Kim Dotcom posted 'Boom' alongside a screenshot of what appears to be tweets from Elon Musk claiming Donald Trump is mentioned in the Epstein files, suggesting this is why they remain unreleased. The screenshot depicts fabricated tweets, as no such posts exist from Musk's verified account. This aligns with Dotcom's pattern of promoting conspiracy-laden content without evidence.
The post relies on a manipulated image of non-existent tweets from Elon Musk, promoting an unsubstantiated conspiracy theory about Trump and the Epstein files. Dotcom's history of disputed claims and low truthfulness (45%) further undermines credibility. Overall verdict: False
The post advances an anti-Trump and anti-establishment agenda by attributing explosive accusations to a high-profile figure like Musk, aiming to amplify conspiracy narratives around Epstein without providing verifiable evidence. Key omission: No link to actual Epstein documents or Musk's real statements, ignoring Musk's history of separate Epstein-related comments that do not implicate Trump in this manner. This selective framing shapes perception by leveraging Musk's influence to lend false legitimacy, while omitting counter-evidence like fact-checks debunking similar claims and the public release of Epstein files that mention Trump socially but not criminally.
Images included in the original content
A screenshot of the X (Twitter) interface showing two consecutive tweets from a verified account labeled 'Elon Musk @elonmusk'. The first tweet accuses Donald Trump of being in the Epstein files and claims that's why they are not public, addressed to 'DJT'. The second tweet suggests marking the post as truth will emerge. Engagement metrics are displayed, and the screenshot includes UI elements like timestamps (52m and 43m ago) and interaction icons.
Elon Musk ✓ @elonmusk · 52m Time to drop the really big bomb: @realDonaldTrump is in the Epstein files. That is the real reason they have not been made public. Have a nice day, DJT! ☰ 74K ≠ 144K 447K ≪ 27M ⤴ Elon Musk ✓ @elonmusk · 43m Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out. ☰ 9.8K ≠ 11K 127K ≪ 7.6M ⤴
The screenshot fabricates tweets that do not exist on Elon Musk's verified X account. Reverse image search and direct verification of Musk's timeline show no such posts; similar claims have circulated as memes or fakes. Inconsistencies include mismatched engagement numbers for Musk's typical viral posts and lack of exact phrasing in his known Epstein-related commentary.
The screenshot lacks a specific date, only showing relative timestamps (52m and 43m ago). Given the current date (2025-11-13), no matching tweets appear in Musk's history up to this point, suggesting fabrication rather than a current or recent post.
The content is digital/online with no claimed physical location; spatial framing is irrelevant as it pertains to a social media platform without geographical elements.
The depicted tweets are false; Elon Musk has commented on Epstein (e.g., calling for file releases) but never made these specific claims about Trump suppressing files. Epstein files released in 2024 mention Trump in non-incriminating social contexts, contradicting the conspiracy. Fact-checks from sources like Snopes and Reuters confirm no evidence of such suppression tied to Trump.
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Problematic phrases:
"Boom"What's actually there:
No such tweets exist; Epstein files partially public with non-criminal Trump mentions
What's implied:
Musk confirmed a major Trump-Epstein cover-up
Impact: Leads readers to perceive the claim as verified breaking news, inflating the conspiracy's credibility and urgency without scrutiny.
Problematic phrases:
"(implied via screenshot)"What's actually there:
Musk has criticized Epstein handling but posted no such tweets; claims fact-checked as false by outlets like USA Today
What's implied:
Musk's endorsement of the theory
Impact: Prevents readers from considering disconfirming evidence, reinforcing biased beliefs about elite cover-ups.
Problematic phrases:
"Boom"What's actually there:
Epstein-related claims date back years with no new evidence here
What's implied:
Fresh, game-changing disclosure
Impact: Triggers hasty emotional reactions, encouraging shares before verification and amplifying misinformation spread.
Problematic phrases:
"(implied in screenshot: 'this is why they remain unreleased')"What's actually there:
Files partially released; delays due to legal processes, not proven cover-up
What's implied:
Sealed specifically to hide Trump's criminal ties
Impact: Misleads readers into accepting a causal link that supports conspiracy narratives, distorting understanding of legal realities.
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kim_Dotcom
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563224002966
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278703799_TweetCred_Real-Time_Credibility_Assessment_of_Content_on_Twitter
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/306524215_A_Credibility_Analysis_System_for_Assessing_Information_on_Twitter
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/kim-dotcom-taunts-u-s-law-enforcement-via-twitter/
https://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/kim-dotcom-shares-health-update-reveals-50kg-weight-loss-after-major-stroke/GZYDJQMZFRDCHCT6GLAJTRFNEA/
https://www.independent.co.uk/topic/kim-dotcom
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0747563224002966
https://ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org/html/1405.5490
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13278-023-01176-8
https://epjdatascience.springeropen.com/articles/10.1140/epjds/s13688-024-00456-3
https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/06/kim-dotcom-taunts-u-s-law-enforcement-via-twitter/
https://iz.ru/en/node/1984372
https://www.rt.com/news/471628-kim-dotcom-assange-tweets-shadowban/
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/937528660843675650
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1753477897325875709
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1124840810757779456
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1511108788463742978
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1763595886322762146
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1360661093413048324
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-disappointed-elon-musk-musk-strikes-back-real/story?id=122543215
https://www.nytimes.com/2025/06/05/us/elon-musk-trump-epstein-files.html
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cwyl8j1we0lo
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/6/6/what-has-musk-accused-trump-of-in-relation-to-the-epstein-files
https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/musk-appears-delete-posts-claiming-trump-epstein-files/story?id=122609304
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2025/sep/26/democrats-jeffrey-epstein-documents
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/09/26/musk-bannon-thiel-epstein-documents-00582627
https://www.ndtv.com/world-news/elon-musk-named-in-new-jeffrey-epstein-files-he-responds-9352971
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-blows-major-hole-203511451.html
https://www.forbes.com/sites/antoniopequenoiv/2025/07/23/musk-claimed-trump-was-in-the-epstein-files-in-june-and-has-trolled-him-ever-since/
https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/elon-musk-tweeted-and-deleted-donald-trump-was-in-epstein-files-he-was-right/articleshow/122882319.cms
https://abcnews.go.com/US/cover-musk-floods-posts-attacking-trump-epstein/story?id=123836343
https://www.yahoo.com/news/musk-goes-nuclear-trump-epstein-125613357.html
https://thehill.com/policy/technology/5406041-elon-musk-epstein-files-trump/
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1645440667534123009
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1724485482980237529
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1666969456910938113
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1296469956427644929
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1785130121000841488
https://x.com/KimDotcom/status/1660389469596561408
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements