Post by @atalovesyou
84% credible (89% factual, 74% presentation). The core claim of a drastic decline in Indian startups accepted to Y Combinator from 2021 to 2025 aligns with reported trends, though exact numbers may vary slightly. However, the presentation omits key context such as YC's options for remote participation and non-visa factors, resulting in a framing violation that impacts overall credibility.
Analysis Summary
The post claims a drastic 98% drop in Indian startups accepted to Y Combinator from 66 in 2021 to just 1 in 2025, attributing it primarily to US visa rejections amid India's thriving startup scene. The core statistic on acceptance decline aligns with reported trends, though exact numbers may vary slightly based on definitions of 'Indian founders'. It highlights specific cases like Gigaml's rejection and praises exceptions like Bolna, while warning of worsening under potential Trump policies.
Original Content
The Facts
The post's key claims on the decline in Indian YC acceptances are supported by public reports and YC data trends, with visa issues cited as a major factor by sources like TechCrunch; India's funding stats are accurate per 2024 reports. Specific anecdotes like Gigaml appear credible based on founder statements, though the 98% drop calculation is approximate. Verdict: Largely True, with minor potential for definitional variances in founder counts.
Benefit of the Doubt
The author advances a pro-India immigration reform agenda, emphasizing US visa barriers to spotlight systemic issues for high-skilled Indian talent and critique policies like those under Trump. It selectively highlights dramatic declines and success stories to evoke frustration and urgency, omitting broader context such as YC's overall batch sizes, non-visa factors like application quality or remote participation options, and increasing Indian funding from local VCs which could mitigate US dependency. This framing shapes perception toward viewing US opportunities as increasingly inaccessible, potentially motivating advocacy without addressing self-sustaining Indian ecosystems.
Predictions Made
Claims about future events that can be verified later
With Trump's tighter immigration policies, this gap will only widen.
Prior: 60% for political predictions. Evidence: Historical patterns and X sentiment support; author's bias toward reform strengthens but speculative. Posterior: 75%.
Visual Content Analysis
Images included in the original content
VISUAL DESCRIPTION
A blue line graph on a white background titled 'Indian Startups in YC' with Y-axis labeled from 0 to 75 (increments of 25) representing number of startups, X-axis years from 2020 to 2025; the line starts near 0 in 2020, peaks around 66 in 2021, declines to about 12 in 2023, and drops to 1 in 2025; an orange Y Combinator logo is in the top right.
TEXT IN IMAGE
Indian Startups in YC 75 30 25 0 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 [Y Combinator logo]
MANIPULATION
No signs of editing, inconsistencies, or artifacts; the graph appears cleanly rendered with standard charting elements.
TEMPORAL ACCURACY
The graph includes data up to 2025, aligning with the post's current-year reference (2025) and recent YC batches like F25.
LOCATION ACCURACY
The image is a data visualization without specific locations depicted, so spatial framing is not applicable.
FACT-CHECK
The graph's trend matches reported YC data from sources like TechCrunch (e.g., sharp drop in Indian/Southeast Asian startups post-2021 due to visas); exact points (e.g., 66 in 2021) align with X posts and YC directories, though precise counts may depend on founder location definitions—no contradictions found.
How Is This Framed?
Biases, omissions, and misleading presentation techniques detected
Directly attributes the decline in YC acceptances to US visa rejections using causal language, implying primary causation without substantiating that visas are the sole or dominant factor over others like application quality or selection criteria.
Problematic phrases:
"The reason? U.S. visa rejections.""But if founders can't get visas, YC can't back them."What's actually there:
Visa issues cited as a major but not exclusive factor in reports (e.g., TechCrunch)
What's implied:
Visa rejections as the definitive cause of the 98% drop
Impact: Leads readers to overestimate the role of visas in the decline, fostering frustration with US policies while underplaying other barriers or adaptations.
Highlights a 98% drop in Indian founder acceptances using specific years (2021, 2023, 2025) but neglects YC's overall batch size changes or definitions of 'Indian founders' (e.g., location vs. nationality), making the decline appear more isolated and severe.
Problematic phrases:
"2021: 66 accepted 2023: 12 accepted 2025: 1 accepted That's a 98% drop."What's actually there:
YC batches vary in size; reports show trends but exact counts depend on criteria
What's implied:
Absolute collapse in Indian participation without proportional context
Impact: Inflates perceived magnitude of the issue, making US visa barriers seem like an existential threat to Indian founders' access to YC.
Omits key context such as YC's options for remote participation, non-visa factors in selections (e.g., application strength), and India's growing local VC ecosystem that reduces dependency on US programs.
Problematic phrases:
"YC basically stopped accepting Indian founders.""The talent is there. The innovation is there. But if founders can't get visas, YC can't back them."What's actually there:
YC allows remote founders; India's $8.2B funding includes domestic VCs mitigating US needs
What's implied:
Impact: Creates a one-sided narrative of inaccessibility, heightening urgency for immigration reform while downplaying self-sufficiency in India's ecosystem.
Frames the issue with future-oriented warnings about Trump's policies to create immediacy, presenting the gap as poised to 'only widen' without evidence of imminent policy changes or their specific impact.
Problematic phrases:
"With Trump's tighter immigration policies, this gap will only widen."What's actually there:
Policies are prospective; no confirmed details as of post date
What's implied:
Inevitable and rapid worsening post-election
Impact: Evokes fear and calls to action on immigration reform, making the problem feel more pressing than current trends suggest.
Presents India's thriving ecosystem positively but only in contrast to US barriers, omitting how local funding and successes (e.g., more unicorns) allow Indian founders to thrive without YC or US visas.
Problematic phrases:
"Meanwhile, India's startup ecosystem is thriving: → $8.2B deployed in 2024 → #3 globally for startup funding"What's actually there:
India has 100+ unicorns and robust domestic VC; YC is one of many accelerators
What's implied:
Impact: Reinforces dependency on US opportunities, undervaluing India's independent growth and alternatives to mitigate visa issues.
Sources & References
External sources consulted for this analysis
https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/19/yc-says-visa-challenges-hampering-participation-of-international-founders/
https://leapscholar.com/blog/us-visa-rejection-rate-and-reasons/
https://www.businesstoday.in/nri/visa/story/canada-rejects-74-of-indian-student-visa-applications-steep-rise-from-32-last-year-500708-2025-11-04
https://www.reuters.com/world/india/fearing-fraud-canada-rejects-most-indian-study-permit-applicants-2025-11-03/
https://indianexpress.com/article/india/f-1-visa-denials-surge-to-10-year-high-us-rejects-41-per-cent-of-foreign-student-applicants-9902283/
https://www.moneycontrol.com/world/f1-visa-rejections-surge-to-decade-high-what-it-means-for-indian-students-seeking-us-education-article-12973553.html
https://www.lawfirm4immigrants.com/denial-rate-student-visa-2025-us-denials-hit-41-a-10-year-high-what-international-students-need-to-know/
https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/canada-rejects-3-in-4-indian-student-visa-applicants-heres-why-101762219344772.html
https://covaimail.com/74-of-indian-student-visa-applications-rejected-in-2025
https://angelone.in/news/global-market/canada-s-visa-rejection-rate-for-indian-students-spikes-to-74-amid-fraud-crackdown
https://indiatoday.in/india/story/3-in-4-indian-student-visa-applications-to-canada-rejected-in-august-2812884-2025-11-03
https://terratern.com/news/visa-chaos-sees-70-80-percent-drop-in-indian-students-at-us-universities/
https://collegedunia.com/canada/article/canada-tightens-student-visa-rules-80-of-indian-applicants-rejected-in-2025
https://moneycontrol.com/education/dreams-denied-why-80-of-indian-students-face-canada-s-record-visa-rejections-in-2025-article-13539467.html
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1791168809379954701
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1761050827140317690
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1743079918601179349
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1784028668513366091
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1759627468460466329
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1735311122121752942
https://techcrunch.com/2023/09/19/yc-says-visa-challenges-hampering-participation-of-international-founders/
https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/industry/india
https://www.tice.news/tice-trending/y-combinator-cohorts-indian-startups
https://techcrunch.com/2022/03/29/y-combinator-india-winter-2022/
https://www.ycombinator.com/faq/
https://www.ycombinator.com/companies/location/india
https://medial.app/news/from-66-to-4-why-y-combinator-is-backing-fewer-indian-startups-in-2024-the-economic-times-53c6876382033
https://startupnews.fyi/2025/11/11/vcs-take-y-combinator-cue-for-ai-bets
https://m.economictimes.com/tech/technology/visa-hurdles-make-us-tech-hirings-tough-for-indian-founded-ai-startups/amp_articleshow/124707491.cms
https://www.livemint.com/companies/y-combinator-startup-accelerator-vc-funding-unicorn-11758786539408.html
https://news.crunchbase.com/fintech/startups-global-investment-2025-pe-y-combinator/
https://m.economictimes.com/tech/startups/y-combinators-india-cohort-shrinks-amid-local-capital-reshaping-deals-ai-focus/articleshow/122326955.cms
https://voice.lapaas.com/ycombinator-4-indian-startups-2024/
https://www.yahoo.com/news/y-combinator-removes-indian-startup-082148018.html
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1791168809379954701
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1761050827140317690
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1759627468460466329
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1759293239180640346
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1784028668513366091
https://x.com/atalovesyou/status/1742591655872692664
Want to see @atalovesyou's track record?
View their credibility score and all analyzed statements